Tools & Wizards About Us
intermark.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

intermark.com

fake reviews cma,fake reviews creator,get paid amazon reviews-intermark.com

Page Load Speed

574 ms in total

First Response

113 ms

Resources Loaded

190 ms

Page Rendered

271 ms

intermark.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to intermark.com homepage info - get ready to check Intermark best content right away, or after learning these important things about intermark.com

intermark, since 1994, provides seo, sem, analytics, website design, and backend code to implement business logic. we also specialize in wordpress. we can help with all of your website needs.

Visit intermark.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Intermark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 113 ms and then it took 461 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

intermark.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

86/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value460 ms

61/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.712

7/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.4 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

intermark.com

113 ms

style.css

20 ms

!soccer4.gif

37 ms

eld-1_llc_emboss.gif

19 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Intermark.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (113 ms) belongs to the original domain Intermark.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 5.7 kB (71%)

Content Size

8.0 kB

After Optimization

2.3 kB

  • HTML
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Intermark.com main page is 8.0 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 4.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 3.5 kB
  • After minification 3.3 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.1 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 4.5 kB
  • After minification 3.1 kB
  • After compression 866 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intermark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intermark. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

intermark.com

intermark.com

113 ms

style.css

style.css

20 ms

!soccer4.gif

!soccer4.gif

37 ms

eld-1_llc_emboss.gif

eld-1_llc_emboss.gif

19 ms

Accessibility Review

intermark.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

intermark.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

intermark.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intermark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Intermark.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

intermark.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Intermark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: