2.1 sec in total
108 ms
1.8 sec
202 ms
Visit internetpacks.in now to see the best up-to-date Internetpacks content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about internetpacks.in
InternetPacks.in Provide you the latest Internet Packs and Plans details. We provide you GSM & CDMA Packs and Plans including 2G, 3G & 4G
Visit internetpacks.inWe analyzed Internetpacks.in page load time and found that the first response time was 108 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
internetpacks.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
69/100
10%
Value2.9 s
81/100
25%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.015
100/100
15%
Value3.1 s
95/100
10%
108 ms
590 ms
837 ms
79 ms
92 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 26% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Internetpacks.in, 12% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 12% (5 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (837 ms) belongs to the original domain Internetpacks.in.
Page size can be reduced by 73.6 kB (31%)
233.8 kB
160.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Internetpacks.in main page is 233.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 146.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Internetpacks images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 38.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.2 kB or 26% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Internetpacks.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (73%)
37
10
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Internetpacks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
internetpacks.in
108 ms
590 ms
837 ms
widgets.js
79 ms
plusone.js
92 ms
adsbygoogle.js
9 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
60 ms
gprofiles.js
55 ms
wpgroho.js
63 ms
comment-reply.min.js
104 ms
wp-embed.min.js
104 ms
e-201609.js
4 ms
reset.css
22 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
37 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
28 ms
ga.js
55 ms
ca-pub-0349008450824894.js
69 ms
zrt_lookup.html
66 ms
show_ads_impl.js
66 ms
icon-bullet.png
84 ms
__utm.gif
65 ms
dot.png
60 ms
ico-footer-rss.png
59 ms
ads
215 ms
osd.js
94 ms
ads
364 ms
hovercard.css
83 ms
services.css
108 ms
ads
376 ms
g.gif
12 ms
abg.js
24 ms
2655387881665793531
10 ms
s
5 ms
m_js_controller.js
6 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
107 ms
x_button_blue2.png
27 ms
nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png
48 ms
favicon
140 ms
favicon
138 ms
favicon
114 ms
favicon
126 ms
E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js
24 ms
internetpacks.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
internetpacks.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
internetpacks.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Internetpacks.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Internetpacks.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
internetpacks.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Internetpacks. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: