3.2 sec in total
281 ms
2.2 sec
724 ms
Visit intop.no now to see the best up-to-date Intop content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about intop.no
Fetch™. A unique software system that present unstructured information in a structured way. Made available for the everchanging environment, technology and standards of our time.
Visit intop.noWe analyzed Intop.no page load time and found that the first response time was 281 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
intop.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value9.8 s
0/100
25%
Value6.8 s
35/100
10%
Value890 ms
32/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
281 ms
913 ms
25 ms
213 ms
141 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Intop.no, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (913 ms) belongs to the original domain Intop.no.
Page size can be reduced by 119.7 kB (6%)
2.1 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Intop.no main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 90.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Intop images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (80%)
64
13
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
intop.no
281 ms
intop.no
913 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
25 ms
style.min.css
213 ms
classic-themes.min.css
141 ms
nectar-slider.css
149 ms
style.css
130 ms
font-awesome.min.css
178 ms
grid-system.css
52 ms
style.css
103 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
146 ms
css
25 ms
responsive.css
170 ms
flickity.css
179 ms
style.css
182 ms
skin-original.css
215 ms
vc_addons_kit.css
234 ms
animate.min.css
256 ms
js_composer.min.css
216 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
228 ms
jquery.min.js
281 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
273 ms
dashicons.min.css
368 ms
display-opinions-light.css
269 ms
font-awesome.min.css
331 ms
anime.js
277 ms
nectar-slider.js
365 ms
salient-social.js
364 ms
jquery.easing.js
365 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
366 ms
priority.js
454 ms
transit.js
366 ms
waypoints.js
453 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
454 ms
hoverintent.js
495 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
495 ms
touchswipe.min.js
495 ms
caroufredsel.min.js
495 ms
flickity.min.js
494 ms
superfish.js
475 ms
init.js
506 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
428 ms
lib.js
425 ms
shortcode.js
420 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
408 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
407 ms
underscore.min.js
481 ms
backbone.min.js
476 ms
front-end-deps.js
481 ms
front-end.js
479 ms
gtm.js
159 ms
intop_test.png
360 ms
Source-Intop3.svg
347 ms
Source-Intop4.svg
499 ms
office265.png
490 ms
sharepoint.png
490 ms
Group-1.png
493 ms
nublu_nutest.png
462 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
460 ms
shutterstock_1453123070-scaled.jpg
467 ms
shutterstock_1675260034-scaled.jpg
464 ms
logo_blue.png
432 ms
NeueEinstellung-Regular.woff
427 ms
NeueEinstellung-Bold.woff
579 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
144 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
181 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
184 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
184 ms
icomoon.ttf
491 ms
icomoon.woff
492 ms
js
133 ms
analytics.js
143 ms
fbevents.js
141 ms
IntelligentOperations_Logo_hvit.png
303 ms
intop.no accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
intop.no best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
intop.no SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intop.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intop.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
intop.no
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Intop. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: