Tools & Wizards About Us
ip-kamera-test.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

ip-kamera-test.net

▷ IP Kamera Test & Überwachungskamera Test - Stand: 25.10.2023

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

502 ms

ip-kamera-test.net screenshot

About Website

Visit ip-kamera-test.net now to see the best up-to-date IP Kamera Test content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ip-kamera-test.net

IP & WLAN Kamera Test: ✓ Kaufberatung ✓ Produktempfehlungen ✓ Bestenliste ✓ Produktvergleich ✓ Preisvergleich ✓ Angebote ✓ Kauftipps ✓ Kostenlose Infos!

Visit ip-kamera-test.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Ip-kamera-test.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ip-kamera-test.net performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

36/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.098

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.4 s

72/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.ip-kamera-test.net

1061 ms

M9RPTiwoSc5I1E8uLtYvLqnMSdUx0E9MS8vMyUwsSS3JSM1NBUul5eeV6CaWpxbn52JRkVVYmlpUqVuaiWDp5WbmYSoEk5jCYIsB.css

319 ms

hY_RDoIwDEV_yG0QfPBbfCGDFO2yrnMrGPx6hxJ8IZj04d709N7UZfN8tcLsBeOpMe4xQpo3oQhvyQpownCqjB0G9Fi83IHAtMZl0ycOjjvl7GRznzDKBz6bnokgiEoQ_XwQsDbVui6zz63IiD-1D3bMkiXZuARv5m-5Bg9TWVyZSTW60peDk--T-YAgi0GV38eFeQM.js

734 ms

M9BPTEvLzMlMLEktyUjNTdWP188q1k_LrEhN0c1NzSvVy83MAwA.js

224 ms

css

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Ip-kamera-test.net, 11% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ip-kamera-test.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 623.5 kB (29%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ip-kamera-test.net main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 39.0 kB

  • Original 52.6 kB
  • After minification 46.1 kB
  • After compression 13.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.5 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.0 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IP Kamera Test images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 193.0 kB

  • Original 293.8 kB
  • After minification 293.7 kB
  • After compression 100.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 193.0 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 387.3 kB

  • Original 428.8 kB
  • After minification 244.1 kB
  • After compression 41.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ip-kamera-test.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 387.3 kB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (29%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IP Kamera Test. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.ip-kamera-test.net

www.ip-kamera-test.net

1061 ms

M9RPTiwoSc5I1E8uLtYvLqnMSdUx0E9MS8vMyUwsSS3JSM1NBUul5eeV6CaWpxbn52JRkVVYmlpUqVuaiWDp5WbmYSoEk5jCYIsB.css

M9RPTiwoSc5I1E8uLtYvLqnMSdUx0E9MS8vMyUwsSS3JSM1NBUul5eeV6CaWpxbn52JRkVVYmlpUqVuaiWDp5WbmYSoEk5jCYIsB.css

319 ms

hY_RDoIwDEV_yG0QfPBbfCGDFO2yrnMrGPx6hxJ8IZj04d709N7UZfN8tcLsBeOpMe4xQpo3oQhvyQpownCqjB0G9Fi83IHAtMZl0ycOjjvl7GRznzDKBz6bnokgiEoQ_XwQsDbVui6zz63IiD-1D3bMkiXZuARv5m-5Bg9TWVyZSTW60peDk--T-YAgi0GV38eFeQM.js

hY_RDoIwDEV_yG0QfPBbfCGDFO2yrnMrGPx6hxJ8IZj04d709N7UZfN8tcLsBeOpMe4xQpo3oQhvyQpownCqjB0G9Fi83IHAtMZl0ycOjjvl7GRznzDKBz6bnokgiEoQ_XwQsDbVui6zz63IiD-1D3bMkiXZuARv5m-5Bg9TWVyZSTW60peDk--T-YAgi0GV38eFeQM.js

734 ms

M9BPTEvLzMlMLEktyUjNTdWP188q1k_LrEhN0c1NzSvVy83MAwA.js

M9BPTEvLzMlMLEktyUjNTdWP188q1k_LrEhN0c1NzSvVy83MAwA.js

224 ms

css

css

25 ms

custom.php

custom.php

658 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

313 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

33 ms

tracker.php

tracker.php

515 ms

publicon.png

publicon.png

304 ms

blog_button1.gif

blog_button1.gif

304 ms

image.png

image.png

315 ms

ip-wlan-kamera-test.gif

ip-wlan-kamera-test.gif

298 ms

samsung-snh-p6410bn-test-100x100.jpg

samsung-snh-p6410bn-test-100x100.jpg

300 ms

innenkamera-icon.png

innenkamera-icon.png

301 ms

aussenkamera-icon.png

aussenkamera-icon.png

509 ms

ip-kamera-vergleich.jpg

ip-kamera-vergleich.jpg

511 ms

ip-kamera-inneneinsatz.jpg

ip-kamera-inneneinsatz.jpg

513 ms

ip-kamera-funktionen.jpg

ip-kamera-funktionen.jpg

513 ms

ip-kamera-ausseneinsatz.jpg

ip-kamera-ausseneinsatz.jpg

513 ms

ip-kamera-testsieger.jpg

ip-kamera-testsieger.jpg

686 ms

d-link-dcs-800lp-ip-kamera-50x50.jpg

d-link-dcs-800lp-ip-kamera-50x50.jpg

651 ms

trendnet-TV-IP311PI-test-50x50.jpg

trendnet-TV-IP311PI-test-50x50.jpg

661 ms

instar-in-3011-preisvergleich-50x50.jpg

instar-in-3011-preisvergleich-50x50.jpg

662 ms

instar-in-5907hd-testbericht-50x50.jpg

instar-in-5907hd-testbericht-50x50.jpg

673 ms

keekoon-t2-test-50x50.jpg

keekoon-t2-test-50x50.jpg

715 ms

exklusive-angebote.png

exklusive-angebote.png

969 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1082 ms

collect

collect

22 ms

JWa1L_rBRW4

JWa1L_rBRW4

79 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

28 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

48 ms

base.js

base.js

80 ms

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

51 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

51 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

43 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

45 ms

publicon.png

publicon.png

174 ms

custom.php

custom.php

745 ms

ui-bg_highlight-soft_100_eeeeee_1x100.png

ui-bg_highlight-soft_100_eeeeee_1x100.png

387 ms

ui-bg_glass_100_f6f6f6_1x400.png

ui-bg_glass_100_f6f6f6_1x400.png

386 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

6 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

10 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

11 ms

Accessibility Review

ip-kamera-test.net accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ip-kamera-test.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ip-kamera-test.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ip-kamera-test.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ip-kamera-test.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ip-kamera-test.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of IP Kamera Test. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: