Tools & Wizards About Us
irflag.ir screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

irflag.ir

ایران پرچم :‌ مرکز تحصصی چاپ انواع پرچم تبلیغاتی رومیزی - اهتزاز - ساحلی - قطره ای

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

482 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

irflag.ir screenshot

About Website

Visit irflag.ir now to see the best up-to-date Irflag content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about irflag.ir

ایران پرچم مرکز تخصصی چاپ انواع پرچم رومیزی - تشریفاتی - اهتزاز - کشور ها - نشان تجاری شرکت ها - چات انواع پرچم با ماشین الات تخصصی در اسرع وقت

Visit irflag.ir

Key Findings

We analyzed Irflag.ir page load time and found that the first response time was 482 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

irflag.ir performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value2.833

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

irflag.ir

482 ms

bootstrap.min.css

583 ms

animate.min.css

397 ms

font-awesome.min.css

295 ms

lightbox.css

206 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Irflag.ir and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Irflag.ir.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 391.3 kB (20%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Irflag.ir main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 21.1 kB

  • Original 25.8 kB
  • After minification 21.6 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.1 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 49.7 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Irflag images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 116.5 kB

  • Original 169.5 kB
  • After minification 160.4 kB
  • After compression 53.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 116.5 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 204.0 kB

  • Original 238.5 kB
  • After minification 215.5 kB
  • After compression 34.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Irflag.ir needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 204.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (36%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

25

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Irflag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

irflag.ir

irflag.ir

482 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

583 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

397 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

295 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

206 ms

main.css

main.css

299 ms

preset1.css

preset1.css

291 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

400 ms

logo.png

logo.png

492 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

818 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

817 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

818 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

820 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

882 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

967 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

1131 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

1149 ms

9.jpg

9.jpg

1255 ms

10.jpg

10.jpg

1310 ms

11.jpg

11.jpg

1318 ms

12.jpg

12.jpg

1491 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1546 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1365 ms

jquery.inview.min.js

jquery.inview.min.js

1382 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

1424 ms

mousescroll.js

mousescroll.js

1440 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

1646 ms

jquery.countTo.js

jquery.countTo.js

1647 ms

lightbox.min.js

lightbox.min.js

1648 ms

main.js

main.js

1648 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

1570 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

1842 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

1877 ms

about-bg.jpg

about-bg.jpg

1570 ms

features-bg.jpg

features-bg.jpg

1569 ms

contact-bg.jpg

contact-bg.jpg

1619 ms

close.png

close.png

1570 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

1587 ms

prev.png

prev.png

1617 ms

next.png

next.png

1764 ms

Shabnam.woff

Shabnam.woff

1759 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1903 ms

Accessibility Review

irflag.ir accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

irflag.ir best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

irflag.ir SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FA

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Irflag.ir can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Persian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Irflag.ir main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

irflag.ir

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Irflag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: