3.5 sec in total
925 ms
2.4 sec
218 ms
Visit irismark.com now to see the best up-to-date Irismark content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about irismark.com
よい住まいとよい暮らし造りの提案にご協力いたします
Visit irismark.comWe analyzed Irismark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 925 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
irismark.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value4.9 s
28/100
25%
Value8.7 s
16/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.081
94/100
15%
Value4.8 s
78/100
10%
925 ms
340 ms
696 ms
527 ms
721 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Irismark.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Irismark.com.
Page size can be reduced by 160.2 kB (70%)
228.6 kB
68.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Irismark.com main page is 228.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 137.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Irismark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 107.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 107.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Irismark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.8 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (61%)
41
16
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Irismark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
irismark.com
925 ms
style.css
340 ms
hpbparts.css
696 ms
container_6B_2c_middle.css
527 ms
main_6B_2c.css
721 ms
user2.css
371 ms
dvs_common_style.css
506 ms
ButtonClassicSkinPlay.js
733 ms
ClassicSkinPlay.js
925 ms
ClassicNeoSkinPlay.js
841 ms
LineSkinPlay.js
876 ms
LineSimpleSkinPlay.js
868 ms
dvs_settings.js
899 ms
DragObject.js
916 ms
dragMaster.js
1009 ms
helpers.js
1039 ms
dvsplayer.js
1051 ms
reset.css
743 ms
ga.js
19 ms
bg_6B_02_01.png
192 ms
fbg_6Bd.png
180 ms
logo_6B.png
192 ms
narksapporobiru1.jpg
178 ms
button1.gif
182 ms
button2.gif
176 ms
button3.gif
339 ms
button4.gif
349 ms
buttonsong1.gif
354 ms
c25.jpg
360 ms
__utm.gif
20 ms
like.php
100 ms
backvolumecontrol_linesimple.png
293 ms
top_info_6B.png
294 ms
point_6B.png
431 ms
shop_info_6B.png
446 ms
access_6B.png
453 ms
returnTop_6B.png
464 ms
menuBg_6B_01.png
474 ms
playbutton_simpleline.png
476 ms
mutebutton_linesimple.png
598 ms
backposcontrol.png
616 ms
pospic.png
625 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
336 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
374 ms
irismark.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
irismark.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
irismark.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Irismark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Irismark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
irismark.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Irismark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: