4.6 sec in total
353 ms
3.9 sec
291 ms
Visit iseec.es now to see the best up-to-date Iseec content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about iseec.es
Cambridge Institute, tu escuela de idiomas en el centro de Madrid. Especialistas en cursos de inglés por videoconferencia.
Visit iseec.esWe analyzed Iseec.es page load time and found that the first response time was 353 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
iseec.es performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value11.1 s
0/100
10%
Value16.2 s
0/100
25%
Value18.0 s
0/100
10%
Value580 ms
51/100
30%
Value0.212
59/100
15%
Value15.2 s
7/100
10%
353 ms
256 ms
645 ms
192 ms
192 ms
Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Iseec.es, 94% (103 requests) were made to Cambridgeinstitute.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (962 ms) relates to the external source Cambridgeinstitute.net.
Page size can be reduced by 697.1 kB (45%)
1.5 MB
842.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Iseec.es main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 674.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 69.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Iseec images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 464.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 464.7 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 120.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Iseec.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 120.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (59%)
106
43
The browser has sent 106 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Iseec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
iseec.es
353 ms
cambridgeinstitute.net
256 ms
645 ms
style.css
192 ms
shadowbox.css
192 ms
system.css
202 ms
general.css
206 ms
template.css
206 ms
skitter.styles.css
235 ms
addons.css
284 ms
layout.css
285 ms
template.css
305 ms
usertools.css
311 ms
css3.css
313 ms
mega.css
337 ms
typo.css
377 ms
layout.css
380 ms
template.css
506 ms
mega.css
408 ms
template.css
412 ms
mega.css
439 ms
mootools-core.js
666 ms
core.js
480 ms
mootools-more.js
924 ms
jquery.min.js
5 ms
jquery.noconflict.js
514 ms
jquery.lazyload.js
540 ms
caption.js
572 ms
index.php
673 ms
core.js
616 ms
mega.js
644 ms
curvycorners.src.js
785 ms
jquery-1.6.2.min.js
962 ms
btloader.min.js
747 ms
css
25 ms
css
13 ms
system.css
566 ms
ga.js
48 ms
bgd-wrapper.png
113 ms
bgd-wrapper-inner.png
112 ms
es.gif
111 ms
en.gif
112 ms
pt.gif
109 ms
ru.gif
109 ms
it.gif
203 ms
fr.gif
196 ms
ja.gif
196 ms
el.gif
210 ms
cz.gif
210 ms
hi.gif
213 ms
pl.gif
288 ms
sk.gif
291 ms
de.gif
304 ms
zh.gif
311 ms
tw.gif
313 ms
tr.gif
313 ms
bgd-nav-l0-over.png
382 ms
arrow3.png
383 ms
bgd-nav-child.png
406 ms
arrow.png
411 ms
logocambridge.png
375 ms
bgd-search-field.png
377 ms
bgd-search-button.png
437 ms
bgd-slideshow.png
439 ms
bg-mod-topsl.jpg
469 ms
banner-home-bulats1.jpg
478 ms
madrid.jpg
690 ms
banner-test-nivel-eng.png
595 ms
pasarela.jpg
530 ms
online-courses.jpg
531 ms
bt_imax_izq.png
572 ms
Facebook1.png
578 ms
Linkedin1.png
624 ms
Twitter1.png
625 ms
GkRQHvchMkUIVL72Zh3gyw.ttf
40 ms
__utm.gif
18 ms
jquery-1.6.2.min.js
719 ms
jquery.skitter.min.js
620 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.min.js
634 ms
jquery.animate-colors-min.js
655 ms
Google1.png
655 ms
youtube.png
759 ms
blog.png
676 ms
cambridge-university-logo-p.png
676 ms
bulats-logo-p.png
672 ms
bulats_agent.png
665 ms
capman-logo-p.png
718 ms
lcci-logo-p.png
720 ms
madrid-excelente-logo-p.png
651 ms
tp-ue-mt-logo-p.png
661 ms
logoestilocasablanca.png
649 ms
icon-telef-p.png
645 ms
icon-direccion-p.png
720 ms
icon-correo-p.png
720 ms
facebook-pie.png
660 ms
linkedin-pie.png
672 ms
twitter-pie.png
642 ms
google-pie.png
638 ms
youtube-pie.png
720 ms
blog-pie.png
721 ms
bgd-bottom-r.png
669 ms
bgd-bottom.png
665 ms
dot-line.png
635 ms
bgd-module-h3.png
644 ms
bgd-left-module-h3.png
668 ms
bgd_left.jpg
666 ms
prev.png
372 ms
next.png
373 ms
back-box-label-black.png
382 ms
ajax-loader.gif
387 ms
iseec.es accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
iseec.es best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
iseec.es SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Iseec.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Iseec.es main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
iseec.es
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Iseec. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: