2.3 sec in total
283 ms
1.6 sec
442 ms
Visit ismfocalpoint.com now to see the best up-to-date Ismfocalpoint content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ismfocalpoint.com
Just another WordPress site
Visit ismfocalpoint.comWe analyzed Ismfocalpoint.com page load time and found that the first response time was 283 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
ismfocalpoint.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value6.2 s
43/100
10%
Value590 ms
50/100
30%
Value0.198
62/100
15%
Value9.4 s
31/100
10%
283 ms
222 ms
159 ms
29 ms
40 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Ismfocalpoint.com, 11% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (753 ms) belongs to the original domain Ismfocalpoint.com.
Page size can be reduced by 64.5 kB (10%)
632.8 kB
568.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Ismfocalpoint.com main page is 632.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 486.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 64.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ismfocalpoint images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 73 (88%)
83
10
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ismfocalpoint. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ismfocalpoint.com
283 ms
dashicons.min341d.css
222 ms
jquery-ui-dialog.min341d.css
159 ms
layerslider4c7e.css
29 ms
css
40 ms
style8a54.css
194 ms
styles5597.css
29 ms
settingsb62d.css
202 ms
stylec66d.css
160 ms
basec66d.css
80 ms
layoutc66d.css
90 ms
shortcodesc66d.css
101 ms
animations.minc66d.css
112 ms
jquery.ui.allc66d.css
128 ms
prettyPhotoc66d.css
135 ms
jplayer.blue.mondayc66d.css
146 ms
responsivec66d.css
157 ms
css
35 ms
css
37 ms
jqueryb8ff.js
356 ms
scripts5597.js
186 ms
jquery-migrate.min330a.js
177 ms
greensockcd11.js
188 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery4c7e.js
446 ms
layerslider.transitions4c7e.js
196 ms
jquerya560.js
200 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.minb62d.js
203 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.minb62d.js
268 ms
style.css
207 ms
jquery.js
434 ms
wowslider.js
403 ms
script.js
346 ms
email-decode.min.js
213 ms
jquery-2.2.0.min.js
20 ms
core.mine899.js
242 ms
widget.mine899.js
251 ms
mouse.mine899.js
262 ms
resizable.mine899.js
271 ms
draggable.mine899.js
280 ms
button.mine899.js
288 ms
position.mine899.js
460 ms
dialog.mine899.js
459 ms
wpdialog.min341d.js
464 ms
sortable.mine899.js
315 ms
tabs.mine899.js
303 ms
accordion.mine899.js
301 ms
pluginsc66d.js
299 ms
menuc66d.js
301 ms
animations.minc66d.js
300 ms
jplayer.minc66d.js
394 ms
translate3dc66d.js
361 ms
scriptsc66d.js
477 ms
comment-reply.min341d.js
342 ms
wp-embed.min341d.js
335 ms
ISM-Logo-1.jpg
258 ms
TI_1.jpg
335 ms
TI_3.jpg
30 ms
TI_4.jpg
388 ms
TI_2.jpg
31 ms
russia.jpg
256 ms
ukraine.jpg
72 ms
georgia.jpg
74 ms
china.jpg
120 ms
kyrgyzstan.jpg
122 ms
kazakistan.jpg
255 ms
3.jpeg
251 ms
6.jpeg
269 ms
4.jpeg
389 ms
1.jpeg
333 ms
5.jpeg
390 ms
2.jpeg
285 ms
7.jpeg
297 ms
9.jpeg
424 ms
11.jpeg
506 ms
12.jpeg
476 ms
13.jpeg
558 ms
14.jpeg
533 ms
15.jpeg
544 ms
16.jpeg
557 ms
17.jpeg
640 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
92 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
222 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
240 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
238 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
239 ms
mfn-iconsbad6.woff
753 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf
239 ms
embed
233 ms
box_shadow_button.png
613 ms
events-bg.jpg
736 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
141 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
158 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
157 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
158 ms
js
73 ms
ismfocalpoint.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ismfocalpoint.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ismfocalpoint.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ismfocalpoint.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ismfocalpoint.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ismfocalpoint.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ismfocalpoint. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: