Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

itracksat.com

VSAT in Egypt - Satellite Internet - VSAT in African & Middle East

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

218 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

343 ms

itracksat.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to itracksat.com homepage info - get ready to check Itracksat best content for Myanmar right away, or after learning these important things about itracksat.com

iTRACKsat provides all VSAT services in African & Middle East installations, de-installtions,relocation,maintenance and converting to auto-pointing .

Visit itracksat.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Itracksat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 218 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

itracksat.com performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

itracksat.com

218 ms

www.itracksat.com

240 ms

style.css

103 ms

jquery.min.js

189 ms

restive.min.js

299 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Itracksat.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Itracksat.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (84%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

296.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Itracksat.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 9.1 kB

  • Original 13.0 kB
  • After minification 11.8 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.1 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 1.5 MB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 236.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Itracksat needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 87% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 54.1 kB
  • After minification 54.1 kB
  • After compression 52.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 931 B

  • Original 4.2 kB
  • After minification 4.2 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Itracksat.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 931 B or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (13%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Itracksat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

itracksat.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

itracksat.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

itracksat.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1256

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Itracksat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Itracksat.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1256. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Itracksat. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: