Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

test.iflscience.com

IFLScience

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

17 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

704 ms

test.iflscience.com screenshot

About Website

Visit test.iflscience.com now to see the best up-to-date Test IFLScience content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about test.iflscience.com

Visit test.iflscience.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Test.iflscience.com page load time and found that the first response time was 17 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

test.iflscience.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

test.iflscience.com

17 ms

css__s_3Wsp8W-QDlpDjvsYHWQXQrN1W_ROcgP-jJQRyBFHY__bia-e8CRjoArq9Mch0qkoV4izfAKo6Avn1cxil1UxiM__vkxv7__QVeIqUh8Xwl3KaRj7YWoJUhvMOUQ2KRkLkK8.css

26 ms

jquery.min.js

53 ms

js__2l6VblLu9lIv3Bvz0xQcqmP1ZbDDBbWC_u-HZfVicrQ__JNZR90B-n30F0aZkZslCL8sH0Xe1qk7hxIH8TltTeYA__vkxv7__QVeIqUh8Xwl3KaRj7YWoJUhvMOUQ2KRkLkK8.js

24 ms

js__DM9fyPUm6YYgJl7_XRedZE48Z5g8TfFIJaEpjLyx9Ds__WQVFZUCptsfntauZ8aWYZLjzVoTXPOJXqSjHLgT9mYQ__vkxv7__QVeIqUh8Xwl3KaRj7YWoJUhvMOUQ2KRkLkK8.js

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 205 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 12% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Test.iflscience.com, 9% (18 requests) were made to Ce.lijit.com and 6% (13 requests) were made to Us-u.openx.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (649 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.taboola.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (38%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Test.iflscience.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 514.9 kB

  • Original 572.0 kB
  • After minification 565.8 kB
  • After compression 57.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 514.9 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 49.2 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Test IFLScience images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 526.0 kB

  • Original 795.7 kB
  • After minification 789.0 kB
  • After compression 269.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 526.0 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 54.2 kB

  • Original 68.0 kB
  • After minification 68.0 kB
  • After compression 13.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Test.iflscience.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 54.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 120 (68%)

Requests Now

177

After Optimization

57

The browser has sent 177 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Test IFLScience. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

test.iflscience.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Test.iflscience.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Test.iflscience.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Test IFLScience. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: