2 sec in total
181 ms
1.3 sec
516 ms
Welcome to challengefactory.journalengine.com homepage info - get ready to check Challenge Factory Journalengine best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about challengefactory.journalengine.com
Career change programs for the “Successful, but not satisfied.”
Visit challengefactory.journalengine.comWe analyzed Challengefactory.journalengine.com page load time and found that the first response time was 181 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
challengefactory.journalengine.com performance score
181 ms
209 ms
200 ms
118 ms
161 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Challengefactory.journalengine.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.aspnetcdn.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (484 ms) belongs to the original domain Challengefactory.journalengine.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (68%)
1.7 MB
529.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Challengefactory.journalengine.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.1 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Challenge Factory Journalengine images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 862.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 862.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 226.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Challengefactory.journalengine.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 226.5 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (86%)
69
10
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Challenge Factory Journalengine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
challengefactory.journalengine.com
181 ms
login.aspx
209 ms
DXR.axd
200 ms
pretty.css
118 ms
Styles.css
161 ms
FullPage.css
108 ms
fvk.css
101 ms
niceforms-ravka.css
105 ms
btn.css
151 ms
lightbox.css
156 ms
style.css
165 ms
site.css
185 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
311 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
71 ms
additional-methods.min.js
119 ms
lightbox.min.js
219 ms
json2.js
232 ms
autoresize.jquery.min.js
231 ms
date.format.js
234 ms
jquery.watermarkinput.js
238 ms
swfobject.js
33 ms
jquery.blockUI.js
238 ms
MicrosoftAjax.js
294 ms
MicrosoftAjaxApplicationServices.js
241 ms
MicrosoftAjaxTimer.js
273 ms
MicrosoftAjaxWebForms.js
279 ms
CommonJavaScript.js
286 ms
jhelpers.js
278 ms
jhelpers-forms.js
437 ms
jhelpers-queries.js
435 ms
jhelpers-devexpress.js
438 ms
jhelpers-telerik.js
438 ms
jhelpers-popup.js
439 ms
jhelpers-border-form.js
439 ms
ui.notificationmsg.js
442 ms
WebServices.js
441 ms
form.common.js
441 ms
form.location.js
443 ms
form.journals.js
471 ms
WebResource.axd
455 ms
ScriptResource.axd
484 ms
ScriptResource.axd
419 ms
ScriptResource.axd
410 ms
DXR.axd
443 ms
css
38 ms
css
18 ms
close.png
61 ms
loading.gif
57 ms
prev.png
55 ms
next.png
59 ms
PageCorners_TopLeft.png
57 ms
d.gif
96 ms
PageCorners_TopRight.png
96 ms
logo.png
292 ms
dhr3hrby.png
347 ms
powered_by_21.png
290 ms
PageCorners_BottomLeft.png
288 ms
PageCorners_BottomRight.png
291 ms
DXR.axd
293 ms
DXR.axd
294 ms
ga.js
47 ms
Medium_Top_Left.gif
212 ms
Medium_Top.gif
211 ms
Medium_Top_Right.gif
211 ms
Medium_Left.gif
212 ms
Medium_Back.gif
214 ms
Medium_Right.gif
213 ms
Medium_Bottom_Left.gif
213 ms
Medium_Bottom.gif
214 ms
Medium_Bottom_Right.gif
215 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
y7lebkjgREBJK96VQi37Zp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
31 ms
dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJbfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
44 ms
challengefactory.journalengine.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Challengefactory.journalengine.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Challengefactory.journalengine.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
challengefactory.journalengine.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Challenge Factory Journalengine. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: