Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

challengefactory.journalengine.com

Sign In to Challenge Factory - Challenge Factory

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

181 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

516 ms

challengefactory.journalengine.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to challengefactory.journalengine.com homepage info - get ready to check Challenge Factory Journalengine best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about challengefactory.journalengine.com

Career change programs for the “Successful, but not satisfied.”

Visit challengefactory.journalengine.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Challengefactory.journalengine.com page load time and found that the first response time was 181 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

challengefactory.journalengine.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

challengefactory.journalengine.com

181 ms

login.aspx

209 ms

DXR.axd

200 ms

pretty.css

118 ms

Styles.css

161 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Challengefactory.journalengine.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.aspnetcdn.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (484 ms) belongs to the original domain Challengefactory.journalengine.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (68%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

529.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Challengefactory.journalengine.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 33.9 kB

  • Original 44.4 kB
  • After minification 36.3 kB
  • After compression 10.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.1 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 16.7 kB

  • Original 254.5 kB
  • After minification 237.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Challenge Factory Journalengine images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 862.6 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 950.5 kB
  • After compression 249.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 862.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 226.5 kB

  • Original 258.0 kB
  • After minification 196.2 kB
  • After compression 31.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Challengefactory.journalengine.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 226.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (86%)

Requests Now

69

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Challenge Factory Journalengine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

challengefactory.journalengine.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Challengefactory.journalengine.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Challengefactory.journalengine.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Challenge Factory Journalengine. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: