Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

conklindedecker.jetsupport.com

Aircraft Operating Cost and Performance Guide - Conklin & de Decker

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

205 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

75 ms

conklindedecker.jetsupport.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to conklindedecker.jetsupport.com homepage info - get ready to check Conklin De Decker Jetsupport best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about conklindedecker.jetsupport.com

Compare the fixed costs, variable cost, and performance of over 500 jets, turboprops, helicopters and piston aircraft, with accurate data from Conklin & de Decker.

Visit conklindedecker.jetsupport.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Conklindedecker.jetsupport.com page load time and found that the first response time was 205 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

conklindedecker.jetsupport.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,580 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.2 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

conklindedecker.jetsupport.com

205 ms

ruxitagentjs_ICA2QSVfgqru_10213210407103252.js

106 ms

js

102 ms

64 ms

runtime-es2015.js

209 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Conklindedecker.jetsupport.com, 12% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 12% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Conklindedecker.jetsupport.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 237.9 kB (25%)

Content Size

937.4 kB

After Optimization

699.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Conklindedecker.jetsupport.com main page is 937.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 893.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 36.3 kB

  • Original 43.8 kB
  • After minification 38.6 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.2 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 201.6 kB

  • Original 893.6 kB
  • After minification 893.6 kB
  • After compression 692.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 201.6 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (64%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Conklin De Decker Jetsupport. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

conklindedecker.jetsupport.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

conklindedecker.jetsupport.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

conklindedecker.jetsupport.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Conklindedecker.jetsupport.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Conklindedecker.jetsupport.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Conklin De Decker Jetsupport. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: