2.2 sec in total
593 ms
1.4 sec
207 ms
Welcome to jamescharlick.com homepage info - get ready to check Jamescharlick best content right away, or after learning these important things about jamescharlick.com
Website Design, Print Design, Illustration and Photography, based in Weston-Super-Mare, Bristol, Somerset
Visit jamescharlick.comWe analyzed Jamescharlick.com page load time and found that the first response time was 593 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
jamescharlick.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
66/100
10%
Value4.3 s
43/100
25%
Value6.0 s
46/100
10%
Value4,210 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value15.1 s
7/100
10%
593 ms
93 ms
121 ms
141 ms
24 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Jamescharlick.com, 22% (11 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Syndication.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (593 ms) belongs to the original domain Jamescharlick.com.
Page size can be reduced by 23.4 kB (3%)
897.8 kB
874.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Jamescharlick.com main page is 897.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 824.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.3 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jamescharlick images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jamescharlick.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.5 kB or 34% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (30%)
46
32
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jamescharlick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
jamescharlick.com
593 ms
style.css
93 ms
flexslider.css
121 ms
colorbox.css
141 ms
jquery.min.js
24 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
169 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
170 ms
slider_home.js
170 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
171 ms
ubuntu-r-webfont.woff
151 ms
widgets.js
46 ms
header_mail.png
82 ms
footer_tel.png
81 ms
header_tel.png
73 ms
header_jc.png
89 ms
JCfeatbg.jpg
79 ms
pure.jpg
309 ms
forge.jpg
365 ms
helenknits.jpg
295 ms
chernobyl.jpg
355 ms
lindy.jpg
484 ms
hairstudio.jpg
255 ms
tacres.jpg
329 ms
gm.jpg
371 ms
bls.jpg
378 ms
bsca.jpg
400 ms
face.jpg
430 ms
helenknits.jpg
442 ms
footer_mail.png
443 ms
footer_twitter.png
441 ms
footer_facebook.png
470 ms
footer_tumblr.png
500 ms
footer_flickr.png
501 ms
overlay.png
512 ms
ubuntu-li-webfont.woff
527 ms
widget_iframe.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.html
179 ms
settings
73 ms
horizon_timeline.a7991bb824d62c8d5038ddd875db8389.js
26 ms
embeds
26 ms
JCharlickcom
36 ms
polyfills-57d3feabe8bfd4ee389c.js
25 ms
runtime-eb61dff4a84b8f906e6b.js
56 ms
modules.c7def0268c66f6a548ed.js
108 ms
main-e9db78f5e7b3d83edd5e.js
103 ms
_app-446fb4a338b215deec8c.js
102 ms
%5BscreenName%5D-c8b4c96951cf24f547b4.js
101 ms
_buildManifest.js
111 ms
_ssgManifest.js
107 ms
icons_category_20px.png
72 ms
flexslider-icon.woff
72 ms
jamescharlick.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
jamescharlick.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
jamescharlick.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jamescharlick.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jamescharlick.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jamescharlick.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jamescharlick. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: