Tools & Wizards About Us
jamescookcabinets.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

jamescookcabinets.com

James Cook Cabinets Bespoke Cabinet and Joinery Specialists

Page Load Speed

702 ms in total

First Response

163 ms

Resources Loaded

374 ms

Page Rendered

165 ms

jamescookcabinets.com screenshot

About Website

Visit jamescookcabinets.com now to see the best up-to-date James Cook Cabinets content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jamescookcabinets.com

Custom made kitchens, wardrobes and furniture. Based in South West London with over 20 years experience. Check the gallery regularly for recently completed projects.

Visit jamescookcabinets.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jamescookcabinets.com page load time and found that the first response time was 163 ms and then it took 539 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jamescookcabinets.com performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.067

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.7 s

68/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jamescookcabinets.com

163 ms

Palace+Gardens-1920w.jpg

185 ms

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

38 ms

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

55 ms

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

53 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jamescookcabinets.com, 60% (3 requests) were made to Static.cdn-website.com and 20% (1 request) were made to Lirp.cdn-website.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (185 ms) relates to the external source Lirp.cdn-website.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 55.3 kB (22%)

Content Size

248.0 kB

After Optimization

192.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Jamescookcabinets.com main page is 248.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 138.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 55.2 kB

  • Original 109.4 kB
  • After minification 106.1 kB
  • After compression 54.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.2 kB or 50% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 155 B

  • Original 138.7 kB
  • After minification 138.7 kB
  • After compression 138.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of James Cook Cabinets. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

jamescookcabinets.com

jamescookcabinets.com

163 ms

Palace+Gardens-1920w.jpg

Palace+Gardens-1920w.jpg

185 ms

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

38 ms

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

55 ms

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

53 ms

Accessibility Review

jamescookcabinets.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

jamescookcabinets.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

jamescookcabinets.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jamescookcabinets.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jamescookcabinets.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jamescookcabinets.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of James Cook Cabinets. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: