7.6 sec in total
217 ms
6.8 sec
629 ms
Visit jdiag.com now to see the best up-to-date JDIAG content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jdiag.com
JDiag is the best tool for SAE J2534
Visit jdiag.comWe analyzed Jdiag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 217 ms and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
jdiag.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
89/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value2.2 s
99/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.489
17/100
15%
Value3.3 s
94/100
10%
217 ms
484 ms
68 ms
198 ms
314 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Jdiag.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Chatserver.comm100.cn and 1% (1 request) were made to Js.users.51.la. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.6 sec) relates to the external source Chatserver.comm100.cn.
Page size can be reduced by 489.9 kB (22%)
2.2 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Jdiag.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.3 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 151.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JDIAG images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 275.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 275.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jdiag.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (7%)
73
68
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JDIAG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
jdiag.com
217 ms
www.jdiag.com
484 ms
style.css
68 ms
jquery.min.js
198 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
314 ms
imgscroll.js
130 ms
global.js
128 ms
18646614.js
706 ms
LiveChat.js
5583 ms
logo.png
97 ms
search_sprite.png
81 ms
20151015wnupbc.png
127 ms
20151023jhploz.png
313 ms
pic1.png
78 ms
20151013pwwufg.jpg
174 ms
1444721692.jpg
257 ms
20151013mgmuon.jpg
192 ms
more_menu1.jpg
131 ms
glo_img1.jpg
194 ms
add.jpg
195 ms
sj.jpg
237 ms
glo_img2.jpg
258 ms
home_news_head_bg1.png
257 ms
home_news_head_bg2.png
258 ms
home_industry_blank_img.jpg
302 ms
dealerships.jpg
449 ms
btn_center.png
323 ms
repair_shops.jpg
508 ms
technicians.jpg
384 ms
locksmiths.jpg
610 ms
engineers-m.jpg
373 ms
pic6.png
387 ms
blank.png
438 ms
more_menu.png
449 ms
engineers.jpg
513 ms
46.png
506 ms
6.png
511 ms
37.png
513 ms
38.png
572 ms
44.png
570 ms
1.png
577 ms
2.png
574 ms
4.png
576 ms
5.png
635 ms
8.png
636 ms
9.png
569 ms
19.png
569 ms
23.png
570 ms
25.png
554 ms
33.png
577 ms
34.png
535 ms
41.png
1116 ms
7.png
1117 ms
45.png
1115 ms
22.png
1070 ms
28.png
1052 ms
31.png
1051 ms
32.png
1127 ms
36.png
1128 ms
43.png
1083 ms
active_img.jpg
1695 ms
glo_img.jpg
1555 ms
imgpng.png
1013 ms
img_icon1.jpg
1067 ms
img_icon2.jpg
1068 ms
img_icon3.jpg
1018 ms
img_icon4.jpg
1014 ms
wechat.png
1067 ms
youtube.png
1014 ms
facebook.png
1017 ms
twitter.png
1020 ms
ChatButton.aspx
469 ms
picture_arrow_left.png
70 ms
picture_arrow_right.png
72 ms
left_menu.jpg
71 ms
jdiag.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
jdiag.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
jdiag.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jdiag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jdiag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jdiag.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of JDIAG. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: