Tools & Wizards About Us
jeitacave.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

jeitacave.com

笔趣阁小说网_叶辰夏若雪最新章节-无弹窗广告的免费小说阅读

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

201 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

270 ms

jeitacave.com screenshot

About Website

Visit jeitacave.com now to see the best up-to-date Jeitacave content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jeitacave.com

笔趣阁小说网_叶辰夏若雪最新章节是免费小说阅读网站，小说免费在线阅读和下载，笔趣阁小说网_叶辰夏若雪最新章节全文字手打最快更新，页面清爽无弹窗，找好看的小说，就到笔趣阁小说网_叶辰夏若雪最新章节。

Visit jeitacave.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jeitacave.com page load time and found that the first response time was 201 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jeitacave.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value33.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value24.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value410 ms

67/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jeitacave.com

201 ms

www.jeitagrotto.com

371 ms

style.css

91 ms

logo.png

137 ms

info.png

201 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jeitacave.com, 96% (25 requests) were made to Jeitagrotto.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (371 ms) relates to the external source Jeitagrotto.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 38.2 kB (14%)

Content Size

265.5 kB

After Optimization

227.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jeitacave.com main page is 265.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 259.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 134 B

  • Original 335 B
  • After minification 288 B
  • After compression 201 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 47 B, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 134 B or 40% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 33.6 kB

  • Original 259.3 kB
  • After minification 225.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jeitacave needs image optimization as it can save up to 33.6 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 4.4 kB

  • Original 5.9 kB
  • After minification 5.5 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jeitacave.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.4 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (28%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jeitacave. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jeitacave.com

jeitacave.com

201 ms

www.jeitagrotto.com

www.jeitagrotto.com

371 ms

style.css

style.css

91 ms

logo.png

logo.png

137 ms

info.png

info.png

201 ms

img01.jpg

img01.jpg

325 ms

Untitled-7.jpg

Untitled-7.jpg

81 ms

organicA.png

organicA.png

109 ms

contentTop.png

contentTop.png

130 ms

contentBg.png

contentBg.png

131 ms

welcomeTop.png

welcomeTop.png

156 ms

welcomeBg.png

welcomeBg.png

175 ms

welcomeBottom.png

welcomeBottom.png

175 ms

headingBg.png

headingBg.png

196 ms

organicHolder.jpg

organicHolder.jpg

197 ms

organicContent.jpg

organicContent.jpg

233 ms

img02.jpg

img02.jpg

249 ms

img03.jpg

img03.jpg

310 ms

img04.jpg

img04.jpg

262 ms

img05.jpg

img05.jpg

262 ms

img06.jpg

img06.jpg

295 ms

awards.jpg

awards.jpg

315 ms

hr.jpg

hr.jpg

314 ms

contactHeading.png

contactHeading.png

332 ms

footerBg.jpg

footerBg.jpg

327 ms

contentBottom.png

contentBottom.png

361 ms

Accessibility Review

jeitacave.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

jeitacave.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

jeitacave.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jeitacave.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Jeitacave.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jeitacave.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jeitacave. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: