2.1 sec in total
12 ms
941 ms
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Jell content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jell.com
Daily online standups to unite teams, make projects and progress visible and reach goals faster—all in minutes a day.
Visit jell.comWe analyzed Jell.com page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
jell.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.3 s
1/100
10%
Value10.7 s
0/100
25%
Value7.3 s
29/100
10%
Value2,270 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.049
99/100
15%
Value20.6 s
2/100
10%
12 ms
40 ms
31 ms
61 ms
81 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Jell.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (336 ms) relates to the external source Google-analytics.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (40%)
4.3 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Jell.com main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.5 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 701 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jell images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 998.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 998.5 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 723.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jell.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 723.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (38%)
63
39
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jell. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jell.com
12 ms
jell.com
40 ms
vendor.86a99ef8.css
31 ms
main.6e87ac67.css
61 ms
font-awesome.min.css
81 ms
css
104 ms
oct.js
154 ms
vendor.fc2a3f67.js
119 ms
config.24ef3ba5.js
87 ms
scripts.11ca8f0b.js
91 ms
templates.1eecc7e9.js
91 ms
twemoji.min.js
89 ms
analytics.js
336 ms
9880673.js
28 ms
562a9587add65fd711000149.js
336 ms
visit
333 ms
jell-logo.svg
184 ms
U1UIEIpJP1M
318 ms
play.svg
154 ms
hootsuite-g.svg
154 ms
salesforce-g.svg
152 ms
mapbox-g.svg
151 ms
twitter-g.svg
155 ms
chef-g.svg
182 ms
xero-g.svg
180 ms
fogcreek-g.svg
179 ms
section-jell.png
203 ms
faces-manager.svg
180 ms
faces-engaged.svg
182 ms
faces-remote.svg
185 ms
section-slack.png
260 ms
section-goals.png
286 ms
mobile-apple.png
184 ms
mobile-google.png
201 ms
section-mobile.png
305 ms
hootsuite.svg
202 ms
twitter.svg
212 ms
chef.svg
211 ms
salesforce.svg
210 ms
comcast.svg
218 ms
mapbox.svg
219 ms
ebates.svg
217 ms
xero.svg
229 ms
hudl.svg
227 ms
chargify.svg
229 ms
fogcreek.svg
231 ms
formstack.svg
233 ms
jell-logo-white.svg
233 ms
bg-home-2.jpg
284 ms
jell-logo-white-tm.svg
258 ms
cta-team-meeting.jpg
283 ms
bird-home-background.png
282 ms
cta-org-meeting.jpg
284 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
137 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
165 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
191 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
194 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
20 ms
slack-home-background.png
136 ms
cta-testimonial.jpg
155 ms
indy.jpg
155 ms
collect
43 ms
track
61 ms
visit
95 ms
tagjs
28 ms
www-embed-player-vflZsBgOl.css
66 ms
www-embed-player.js
93 ms
base.js
173 ms
6BOEML_YqI6cKINK5dmh8ZufcXg7sBa4jeB-I9gQ0xI.js
26 ms
ad_status.js
63 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
22 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
21 ms
jell.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
jell.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
jell.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jell.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jell.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jell.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jell. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: