1 sec in total
67 ms
744 ms
198 ms
Visit jems.jhpiego.com now to see the best up-to-date Jems Jhpiego content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jems.jhpiego.com
An international, non-profit health organization affiliated with The Johns Hopkins University dedicated to improving the health of women and families.
Visit jems.jhpiego.comWe analyzed Jems.jhpiego.com page load time and found that the first response time was 67 ms and then it took 942 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
jems.jhpiego.com performance score
67 ms
338 ms
13 ms
13 ms
13 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jems.jhpiego.com, 60% (49 requests) were made to Jhpiego.org and 16% (13 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (338 ms) relates to the external source Jhpiego.org.
Page size can be reduced by 498.9 kB (44%)
1.1 MB
639.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Jems.jhpiego.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 513.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 28.9 kB, which is 47% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jems Jhpiego images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 265.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 265.6 kB or 52% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 171.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jems.jhpiego.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 171.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (68%)
75
24
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jems Jhpiego. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jems.jhpiego.com
67 ms
www.jhpiego.org
338 ms
node.css
13 ms
defaults.css
13 ms
system.css
13 ms
system-menus.css
14 ms
user.css
14 ms
content-module.css
13 ms
ckeditor.css
13 ms
ctools.css
12 ms
date.css
13 ms
nice_menus.css
14 ms
nice_menus_default.css
13 ms
og.css
14 ms
panels.css
15 ms
views.css
14 ms
style.css
37 ms
js_5180488e6f1749ee3c300c6fca0ae2e6.js
36 ms
golden.css
60 ms
typography.css
33 ms
allinone_bannerWithPlaylist.css
60 ms
jquery.js
62 ms
ui.core.min.js
68 ms
allinone_bannerRotator.css
68 ms
css
25 ms
jquery.min.js
12 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.min.js
78 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js
75 ms
allinone_bannerRotator.js
76 ms
site.js
13 ms
analytics.js
18 ms
gtm.js
49 ms
cse.js
40 ms
6.jpg
17 ms
logo.png
16 ms
donate-now-banner-001.gif
16 ms
homepage-WHP-february-2016-slide-001.jpg
45 ms
homepage-WHP-february-2016-slide-002.jpg
52 ms
homepage-WHP-february-2016-slide-003.jpg
57 ms
LIBM-web-910x234-banner.jpg
58 ms
happenings.gif
45 ms
2535-homepage-image-001.jpg
43 ms
2538-homepage-image-001.jpg
52 ms
introducing-fieldnotes.png
61 ms
signup.gif
56 ms
button_search.png
58 ms
facebook1.gif
58 ms
twitter2.gif
61 ms
rss3.gif
76 ms
youtube4.gif
76 ms
flickr5.gif
77 ms
blog6.gif
77 ms
leftNavOFF.png
78 ms
rightNavOFF.png
77 ms
bottomNavOFF.png
83 ms
collect
8 ms
jquery.min.js
49 ms
cse.js
71 ms
collect
14 ms
collect
17 ms
collect
74 ms
collect
58 ms
widgets.css
29 ms
settings
51 ms
jsapi
41 ms
print.css
16 ms
ga-audiences
43 ms
ga-audiences
30 ms
ga-audiences
28 ms
popover.js
14 ms
default+en.css
7 ms
default.css
28 ms
default+en.I.js
13 ms
242767
44 ms
default.css
25 ms
async-ads.js
39 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
27 ms
small-logo.png
33 ms
search_box_icon.png
34 ms
clear.gif
33 ms
nav_logo114.png
9 ms
main.css
30 ms
jems.jhpiego.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jems.jhpiego.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jems.jhpiego.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jems.jhpiego.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jems Jhpiego. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: