Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

jenandchuck.com

Jen and Chuck Photography

Page Load Speed

11.4 sec in total

First Response

175 ms

Resources Loaded

11.1 sec

Page Rendered

78 ms

jenandchuck.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Jen And Chuck content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jenandchuck.com

We are a husband and wife wedding photography and videography team. We service the Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabame, and Florida Gulf Coast. We also offer destination wedding photography and videograph...

Visit jenandchuck.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jenandchuck.com page load time and found that the first response time was 175 ms and then it took 11.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jenandchuck.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

78/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,310 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.942

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jenandchuck.com

175 ms

jenandchuck.com

278 ms

www.jenandchuck.com

552 ms

bundle-u0q14sLR3vpZh42yHottCQ-20220206124534.js

55 ms

PageData-2t5t1h4m-14ed7974-4565-4561-be9b-c171c3a66286-Y1gGOKpCUnAnXqoq4Cps8g-2.js

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 169 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Jenandchuck.com, 98% (165 requests) were made to Cdn.goodgallery.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Logocdn.goodgallery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.goodgallery.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 936.1 kB (14%)

Content Size

6.7 MB

After Optimization

5.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Jenandchuck.com main page is 6.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-95%

Potential reduce by 936.1 kB

  • Original 985.7 kB
  • After minification 978.5 kB
  • After compression 49.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 936.1 kB or 95% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 23 B

  • Original 5.4 MB
  • After minification 5.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jen And Chuck images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 265.6 kB
  • After minification 265.6 kB
  • After compression 265.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

166

After Optimization

166

The browser has sent 166 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jen And Chuck. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

jenandchuck.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

jenandchuck.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

jenandchuck.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jenandchuck.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jenandchuck.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jen And Chuck. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: