24.9 sec in total
7.5 sec
17.1 sec
315 ms
Click here to check amazing JFOC content for Indonesia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jfoc.net
JFOC NETWORK SOLUTION is Web Hosting Services, Reseller Hosting Services, and VPS Services from Indonesia, web hosting murah dan terbaik indonesia 2018
Visit jfoc.netWe analyzed Jfoc.net page load time and found that the first response time was 7.5 sec and then it took 17.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
jfoc.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value13.0 s
0/100
25%
Value3.6 s
87/100
10%
Value630 ms
47/100
30%
Value0.545
13/100
15%
Value6.9 s
54/100
10%
7487 ms
99 ms
66 ms
105 ms
237 ms
Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (103 requests) were addressed to the original Jfoc.net, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Jfoc.net.
Page size can be reduced by 3.0 MB (76%)
3.9 MB
927.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Jfoc.net main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 96.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.5 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JFOC images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.9 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jfoc.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.9 MB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 91 (87%)
105
14
The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JFOC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.jfoc.net
7487 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
99 ms
colorbox.css
66 ms
font-awesome.css
105 ms
front.css
237 ms
font-awesome.css
111 ms
font-awesome.css
127 ms
styles.css
137 ms
styles.css
164 ms
style.css
167 ms
style.css
174 ms
jquery.prettyphoto.css
218 ms
idangerous.swiper.css
203 ms
mb.YTVPlayer.css
230 ms
timer2.css
232 ms
mb-comingsoon.css
248 ms
animate.css
324 ms
contact-ui.css
313 ms
shortcodes.css
347 ms
pbs.css
297 ms
minimalist.css
326 ms
progressbar.css
301 ms
style.css
363 ms
lbd_layout.css
365 ms
js_composer.min.css
664 ms
Defaults.css
412 ms
ultimate.min.css
623 ms
mpc-styles.css
553 ms
1427511517
3974 ms
style.css
459 ms
jquery.js
575 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
526 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
591 ms
jquery.colorbox.js
722 ms
form_validate.js
721 ms
ultimate.min.js
830 ms
css
24 ms
custom.css
701 ms
jquery-cookie.min.js
676 ms
rackhost.js
647 ms
jquery.color.min.js
639 ms
widget.min.js
649 ms
core.min.js
654 ms
jquery.ui.mouse.min.js
658 ms
slider.min.js
649 ms
accordion.min.js
656 ms
sortable.min.js
703 ms
datepicker.min.js
689 ms
jquery.ui.draggable.min.js
721 ms
jquery.prettyphoto.js
691 ms
idangerous.swiper.js
768 ms
buttons_styles.css
698 ms
css
14 ms
optin_styles.css
709 ms
swfobject.js
684 ms
jquery.metadata.js
704 ms
jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js
729 ms
timer.min.js
759 ms
jquery.mb-comingsoon.js
719 ms
shortcodes.js
777 ms
jquery.easypiechart.min.js
706 ms
chart.js
797 ms
raphael.2.1.0.min.js
792 ms
css
14 ms
css
27 ms
justgage.1.0.1.js
698 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
652 ms
pbs.min.js
623 ms
modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.1.0.min.js
675 ms
flowplayer.min.js
670 ms
pb_main.js
584 ms
comment-reply.min.js
528 ms
SmoothScroll.min.js
544 ms
mpc-vendor.min.js
677 ms
mpc-scripts.min.js
673 ms
wp-embed.min.js
581 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
624 ms
siteHeaderShadow.png
110 ms
jfoclogo.png
109 ms
siteHeaderGradient.png
111 ms
siteHeaderMap.png
109 ms
blueColorButton.png
111 ms
colorButtonPointer.png
214 ms
shared-server-300x218.png
215 ms
virtual-server-300x218.png
216 ms
dedicated-server-300x218.png
217 ms
shared-server.png
489 ms
innerShadowBottom.png
217 ms
contentWrapperOuterShadow.png
215 ms
innerShadowTop.png
485 ms
iconMediumNetwork.png
487 ms
iconMediumCog.png
487 ms
iconMediumServer.png
485 ms
separatorShadow.png
486 ms
iconMediumHelp.png
487 ms
iconSmallPhoneLight.png
487 ms
iconSmallChatLight.png
487 ms
iconSmallEmailLight.png
487 ms
iconSmallClientLight.png
488 ms
twitterWidget.png
487 ms
iconMediumTwitter.png
487 ms
iconSmallTop.png
488 ms
siteFooterBarLogo.png
487 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
103 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMQFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff
103 ms
Defaults.woff
448 ms
true
872 ms
user_timeline.json
94 ms
overlay.png
51 ms
slideSwitchGradient.png
67 ms
jfoc.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
jfoc.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
jfoc.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jfoc.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jfoc.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jfoc.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of JFOC. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: