Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

jht.fi

JHT Kalajoki Ry

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

581 ms

Resources Loaded

5 sec

Page Rendered

342 ms

jht.fi screenshot

About Website

Visit jht.fi now to see the best up-to-date JHT content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jht.fi

JHT Kalajoki Ry

Visit jht.fi

Key Findings

We analyzed Jht.fi page load time and found that the first response time was 581 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jht.fi performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value780 ms

37/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.82

4/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jht.fi

581 ms

style.css

234 ms

coda-slider.css

250 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

620 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.20.custom.min.js

257 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Jht.fi, 6% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Jht.fi.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 354.1 kB (75%)

Content Size

471.1 kB

After Optimization

117.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Jht.fi main page is 471.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 244.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 16.4 kB

  • Original 20.7 kB
  • After minification 17.6 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.0 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 134.9 kB

  • Original 206.1 kB
  • After minification 206.0 kB
  • After compression 71.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 134.9 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 202.8 kB

  • Original 244.4 kB
  • After minification 244.3 kB
  • After compression 41.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jht.fi needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 202.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (20%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

39

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JHT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

jht.fi accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

jht.fi best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

jht.fi SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FI

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jht.fi can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Finnish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jht.fi main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of JHT. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: