51.6 sec in total
319 ms
9.4 sec
41.8 sec
Click here to check amazing Jilljuck content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jilljuck.com
Visit jilljuck.comWe analyzed Jilljuck.com page load time and found that the first response time was 319 ms and then it took 51.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
jilljuck.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value3.5 s
64/100
25%
Value2.8 s
95/100
10%
Value770 ms
38/100
30%
Value0.151
76/100
15%
Value5.1 s
76/100
10%
319 ms
676 ms
828 ms
891 ms
1118 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Jilljuck.com, 60% (26 requests) were made to Static.jilljuck.com and 16% (7 requests) were made to Pics.jilljuck.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.8 sec) relates to the external source Pics.jilljuck.com.
Page size can be reduced by 708.1 kB (53%)
1.3 MB
634.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Jilljuck.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 634.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.6 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.7 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jilljuck images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 491.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 491.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 121.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jilljuck.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 121.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (13%)
40
35
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jilljuck. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
jilljuck.com
319 ms
jilljuck.com
676 ms
main1.css
828 ms
default.css
891 ms
head.min.js
1118 ms
WebResource.axd
66 ms
ScriptResource.axd
98 ms
ScriptResource.axd
141 ms
ScriptResource.axd
112 ms
dc.js
2146 ms
sonupoonam.jpg
6056 ms
041025content_69c2c98a-6178-4f3e-9ade-0b41390e5031.jpg
5840 ms
bg-html.png
1790 ms
logos.png
1790 ms
memeicon.png
2762 ms
icons.png
3043 ms
bg-header-bottom-nav.png
3042 ms
sharesomething.png
3190 ms
loading.gif
3322 ms
defaultprofilepic.png
3321 ms
loading-small.gif
3322 ms
bett.jpg
6691 ms
009913content_319ad07b-7672-4196-91b8-f304b5172651.jpg
6753 ms
086858content_c2b08da8-88d7-42db-9239-2e1f800e8c32.jpg
6755 ms
062820content_07f4221e-2087-4e64-b7d4-7a642c09deb6.jpg
6692 ms
076852content_8f3dae13-27e5-4a19-baa5-9182fd770fc3.jpg
6693 ms
022084content_a9a26815-bc35-477e-b638-bb67fee9b896.jpg
6693 ms
008701content_91b41fa6-63ae-4e74-9974-9c002c061833.jpg
6691 ms
bg-body.png
2690 ms
bullets.png
2690 ms
small-close-normal.png
3028 ms
up-normal.png
4233 ms
refresh-normal.png
4231 ms
bebas.woff
3579 ms
__utm.gif
1212 ms
bg-more.png
1890 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
1115 ms
packery.pkgd.min.js
1115 ms
jquery.client.min.js
1112 ms
main.min.js
1112 ms
common.min.js
1114 ms
jquery.sceditor.bbcode.js
1941 ms
default3.js
1940 ms
jilljuck.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jilljuck.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
jilljuck.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
TA
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jilljuck.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Tamil is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Jilljuck.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jilljuck.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jilljuck. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: