3.2 sec in total
105 ms
2.4 sec
650 ms
Visit jimbo.com now to see the best up-to-date Jimbo content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jimbo.com
Try Jimdo, the all-in-one small business solution. Websites, online stores, bookings, logos, SEO, analytics, domains, and hosting.
Visit jimbo.comWe analyzed Jimbo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
jimbo.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
24/100
10%
Value11.4 s
0/100
25%
Value6.9 s
33/100
10%
Value930 ms
30/100
30%
Value1.165
1/100
15%
Value17.4 s
4/100
10%
105 ms
256 ms
216 ms
190 ms
628 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Jimbo.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to A.jimdo.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Webteam.jimstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source S.yimg.jp.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (36%)
3.5 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Jimbo.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 68.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.2 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jimbo images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 806.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 806.8 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 381.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jimbo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 381.5 kB or 60% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (48%)
46
24
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jimbo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.jimdo.com
105 ms
587e16f425e5a09e4bd647df.min.js
256 ms
style.85a89faf955b37f3f988.css
216 ms
main.85a89faf955b37f3f988.js
190 ms
s0785f1a12dd449fe
628 ms
geo.js
498 ms
u8XmI-_AelZ7Ypp67hCA4ktLz.jpg
164 ms
u14d25hxwCBL8tD0lCZpdrANp.jpg
172 ms
u1qlPhlbU6UtPbsr_gYve5lor.jpg
172 ms
u2FQh1hAFj_vV4D6sq8Gwg8lu.jpg
171 ms
uSC29j9QtRfPIRAtJ2WPxTogE.jpg
171 ms
u354s5GNk_l3d2WxyKLFIrma2.png
172 ms
u1HuXzCqSpHe1vbE5LDLXJTAw.jpg
228 ms
uj_ZXdOAMI6e8TVlvL6fA0bS6.jpg
178 ms
u1ZHrUVKHlQETI3YjDPCe52ly.png
178 ms
uk4yxq6J0hateoDCeV4AZfxoZ.png
177 ms
u11AvBK_L3dpJ9pqAqtCMCHvZ.png
178 ms
u1q-ZFgJ3Msvw7Q2tRUvZ9Yxu.png
178 ms
uPR2-y9DZQYt54rAwt_VGMkac.png
193 ms
u3z5-7VLiXTzEJQKPlC_-e1VT.jpg
181 ms
u3mC99-hUF4xsrZQVvUxsIlPz.jpg
225 ms
async.start-page.styles.e18bbca681dfc67b80150bd11d118ab2.css
47 ms
gtm.js
111 ms
en_US
184 ms
en_US
289 ms
base64.css
107 ms
start-page.a1c80a55fe78062e25be.js
2 ms
light.woff
136 ms
regular.woff
138 ms
bold.woff
146 ms
jimdom.js.af2fb1a1f73f57175385.js
73 ms
gaTracker.js.0520cbe4445f883e1de3.js
91 ms
conversion_async.js
171 ms
fbds.js
196 ms
tv2track.js
456 ms
conversion.js
1267 ms
conversion.js
165 ms
1
471 ms
1
265 ms
analytics.js
153 ms
1YrVjwA=
3 ms
79 ms
105 ms
42 ms
45 ms
collect
8 ms
collect
71 ms
collect
5 ms
collect
76 ms
50 ms
32 ms
31 ms
ga-audiences
14 ms
tv2track.php
98 ms
jimbo.com accessibility score
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
jimbo.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
jimbo.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jimbo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jimbo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jimbo.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jimbo. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: