3.1 sec in total
851 ms
1.5 sec
769 ms
Visit joebuckle.me now to see the best up-to-date Joebuckle content for Iran and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about joebuckle.me
Web developer and open source enthusiast
Visit joebuckle.meWe analyzed Joebuckle.me page load time and found that the first response time was 851 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
joebuckle.me performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value5.4 s
20/100
25%
Value4.3 s
75/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.2 s
51/100
10%
851 ms
84 ms
156 ms
25 ms
160 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Joebuckle.me, 10% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 10% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (851 ms) belongs to the original domain Joebuckle.me.
Page size can be reduced by 275.6 kB (38%)
716.4 kB
440.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Joebuckle.me main page is 716.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 322.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.6 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 618 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Joebuckle images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 147.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 147.0 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 100.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Joebuckle.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 100.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (59%)
29
12
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Joebuckle. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
joebuckle.me
851 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
84 ms
A.wp-syntax.css,qver=563c60b0b1239b516f1d16169974ae96.pagespeed.cf.S1RLOpa5BE.css
156 ms
css
25 ms
A.font-awesome.min.css,qver=563c60b0b1239b516f1d16169974ae96.pagespeed.cf.vAQKlvFmWQ.css
160 ms
A.style.css,qver=563c60b0b1239b516f1d16169974ae96.pagespeed.cf.Ya7IcYqDdB.css
167 ms
A.jetpack.css,qver=563c60b0b1239b516f1d16169974ae96.pagespeed.cf.6U6zowbg8-.css
170 ms
jquery.js,qver=563c60b0b1239b516f1d16169974ae96.pagespeed.jm.zixJPNMRNN.js
251 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js,qver=563c60b0b1239b516f1d16169974ae96.pagespeed.jm.mhpNjdU8Wl.js
178 ms
jquery.cycle.js,qver=563c60b0b1239b516f1d16169974ae96.pagespeed.jm.oRIjEDIOT5.js
230 ms
slideshow-shortcode.js,qver=563c60b0b1239b516f1d16169974ae96.pagespeed.jm.U0g17mKTvW.js
233 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
8 ms
gprofiles.js
58 ms
production.min.js,qver=563c60b0b1239b516f1d16169974ae96.pagespeed.ce.HmKQXPh16N.js
247 ms
e-201611.js
3 ms
ga.js
30 ms
1810256.png
89 ms
x11229691_10155857320650542_4423780503048523382_n.jpg.pagespeed.ic.mX6roZP50V.jpg
349 ms
994x686xScreenshot-from-2015-09-23-085755.png.pagespeed.ic.lSjajYhdth.png
271 ms
700x400xmeteor-logo.png.pagespeed.ic.kS5zzGZx27.png
269 ms
998x208x2000px-Nginx_logo.svg_-e1443610780286.png.pagespeed.ic.D-iaIuzn1u.png
268 ms
400x400x1630826.png.pagespeed.ic.l1rApt2ndm.png
270 ms
2268x1688xWordPress-logo-wordmark.png.pagespeed.ic.aQLO5KCb1J.png
269 ms
widgets.js
8 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
326 ms
__utm.gif
186 ms
hovercard.css
46 ms
services.css
63 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
37 ms
g.gif
26 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
23 ms
joebuckle.me accessibility score
joebuckle.me best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
joebuckle.me SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Joebuckle.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Joebuckle.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
joebuckle.me
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Joebuckle. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: