Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

Page Load Speed

295 ms in total

First Response

59 ms

Resources Loaded

106 ms

Page Rendered

130 ms

joel.com screenshot

About Website

Visit joel.com now to see the best up-to-date Joel content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about joel.com

Visit joel.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Joel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 59 ms and then it took 236 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

joel.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.8 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.1 s

41/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

joel.com

59 ms

oneColLiqJoel.css

11 ms

Cap-reflect-6333-s.png

40 ms

41silh4458a.jpg

39 ms

question-mark.png

30 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Joel.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (59 ms) belongs to the original domain Joel.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 17.6 kB (29%)

Content Size

59.9 kB

After Optimization

42.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Joel.com main page is 59.9 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 52.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 2.5 kB
  • After minification 2.1 kB
  • After compression 1.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 447 B, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 60% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 11.6 kB

  • Original 52.2 kB
  • After minification 40.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Joel needs image optimization as it can save up to 11.6 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 5.1 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 595 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Joel.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Joel. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

joel.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

joel.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

joel.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Joel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Joel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Joel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: