Tools & Wizards About Us
jothidam.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

jothidam.net

酒泉职业技术学院女生好约吗,酒泉阳光汇多少钱一次,酒泉晚上能玩的在什么位置,酒泉晚上吃快餐的地方_火辣

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

190 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

231 ms

jothidam.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to jothidam.net homepage info - get ready to check Jothidam best content for Sri Lanka right away, or after learning these important things about jothidam.net

*空降,酒泉职业技术学院女生好约吗 酒泉阳光汇多少钱一次 酒泉晚上能玩的在什么位置 酒泉晚上吃快餐的地方附近的女人-想过夜电话联系,欢迎您的光临,100元过夜联系电话-洗浴中心一条龙,欢迎您的光临,附近相约-洗浴中心特殊服务,欢迎您的光临

Visit jothidam.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Jothidam.net page load time and found that the first response time was 190 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jothidam.net performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.61

10/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.jothidam.net

190 ms

push.js

632 ms

tj.js

77 ms

common.js

149 ms

hm.js

1698 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Jothidam.net, 17% (1 request) were made to Push.zhanzhang.baidu.com and 17% (1 request) were made to Hm.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Hm.baidu.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 5.8 kB (55%)

Content Size

10.6 kB

After Optimization

4.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Jothidam.net main page is 10.6 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 9.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 465 B

  • Original 1.0 kB
  • After minification 1.0 kB
  • After compression 566 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 465 B or 45% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

  • Original 9.5 kB
  • After minification 8.6 kB
  • After compression 4.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.4 kB or 56% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (75%)

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

1

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jothidam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.jothidam.net

www.jothidam.net

190 ms

push.js

push.js

632 ms

tj.js

tj.js

77 ms

common.js

common.js

149 ms

hm.js

hm.js

1698 ms

common.php

common.php

708 ms

Accessibility Review

jothidam.net accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

jothidam.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

jothidam.net SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    GB2312

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jothidam.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Jothidam.net main page’s claimed encoding is gb2312. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

jothidam.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jothidam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: