2.6 sec in total
180 ms
2.2 sec
227 ms
Visit journalengine.com now to see the best up-to-date Journal Engine content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about journalengine.com
Get into the heads of your clients by reading and responding to their journals and communicating with them in between coaching sessions with JournalEngine™.
Visit journalengine.comWe analyzed Journalengine.com page load time and found that the first response time was 180 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
journalengine.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value3.1 s
74/100
25%
Value10.0 s
9/100
10%
Value1,510 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.076
95/100
15%
Value13.6 s
11/100
10%
180 ms
251 ms
188 ms
429 ms
209 ms
Our browser made a total of 118 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Journalengine.com, 88% (104 requests) were made to Journal.journalengine.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Journal.journalengine.com.
Page size can be reduced by 942.8 kB (67%)
1.4 MB
456.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Journalengine.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 997.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 224 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 224 B or 42% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Journal Engine needs image optimization as it can save up to 31.4 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 728.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 728.0 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 183.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Journalengine.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 183.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 97 (84%)
115
18
The browser has sent 115 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Journal Engine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
journalengine.com
180 ms
features
251 ms
pretty.css
188 ms
Styles.css
429 ms
FullPage.css
209 ms
fvk.css
132 ms
niceforms-ravka.css
144 ms
btn.css
151 ms
lightbox.css
300 ms
style.css
222 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
787 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
57 ms
additional-methods.min.js
84 ms
lightbox.min.js
263 ms
json2.js
274 ms
autoresize.jquery.min.js
279 ms
date.format.js
333 ms
swfobject.js
22 ms
jquery.watermarkinput.js
350 ms
MicrosoftAjax.js
571 ms
MicrosoftAjaxApplicationServices.js
354 ms
MicrosoftAjaxTimer.js
391 ms
MicrosoftAjaxWebForms.js
413 ms
CommonJavaScript.js
602 ms
jhelpers.js
610 ms
jhelpers-forms.js
585 ms
jhelpers-queries.js
482 ms
jhelpers-devexpress.js
680 ms
jhelpers-telerik.js
662 ms
jhelpers-popup.js
807 ms
jhelpers-border-form.js
662 ms
ui.notificationmsg.js
685 ms
WebServices.js
927 ms
form.common.js
731 ms
form.location.js
754 ms
form.journals.js
856 ms
api.js
15 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.1.custom.ravka.js
1221 ms
jquery.qtip.min.css
878 ms
shortcodes.css
1004 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.1.custom.ravka.css
954 ms
ui.tabs.css
887 ms
licensing.css
805 ms
WebResource.axd
859 ms
ScriptResource.axd
851 ms
css
24 ms
ScriptResource.axd
832 ms
ScriptResource.axd
803 ms
jquery.qtip.min.js
984 ms
css
14 ms
recaptcha__en.js
41 ms
analytics.js
20 ms
bg3.gif
48 ms
close.png
49 ms
loading.gif
61 ms
prev.png
68 ms
next.png
90 ms
d.gif
50 ms
key.png
91 ms
logo_21.png
133 ms
default.png
178 ms
btn_signup.png
152 ms
book-edit.png
167 ms
calendar2.png
141 ms
tool_ruler2.png
158 ms
user_id.png
176 ms
mail.png
186 ms
task.png
197 ms
mail-favorite.png
213 ms
search.png
224 ms
attach.png
235 ms
network_application.png
247 ms
shopping_cart.png
256 ms
list.png
241 ms
book_open-check.png
260 ms
notepad_open.png
265 ms
comment-ok.png
283 ms
clock.png
295 ms
pin_blue.png
302 ms
email.png
314 ms
clip_cut.png
317 ms
picture.png
307 ms
social_rss.png
332 ms
gear.png
345 ms
font.png
346 ms
home.png
359 ms
document-bookmark.png
372 ms
mail-edit.png
372 ms
linkid.js
17 ms
sort2.png
350 ms
key.png
358 ms
y7lebkjgREBJK96VQi37Zp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
10 ms
dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJbfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
11 ms
form.png
372 ms
collect
6 ms
collect
86 ms
comments.png
368 ms
daily.png
352 ms
tabsWithSearch.png
355 ms
privacycontrols.png
328 ms
reviews.png
331 ms
bottom.gif
325 ms
top_bar_bg.png
321 ms
pill.gif
342 ms
side_left.png
322 ms
Light_Top_Left.gif
323 ms
Light_Top.gif
332 ms
Light_Top_Right.gif
323 ms
Light_Left.gif
318 ms
Light_Back.gif
326 ms
Light_Right.gif
319 ms
Light_Bottom_Left.gif
310 ms
Light_Bottom.gif
322 ms
Light_Bottom_Right.gif
315 ms
Large_Left.gif
306 ms
Large_Middle.gif
326 ms
Large_Right.gif
320 ms
side_right.png
308 ms
journalengine.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
journalengine.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
journalengine.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Journalengine.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Journalengine.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
journalengine.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Journal Engine. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: