10.5 sec in total
495 ms
5 sec
5 sec
Visit jsbeautifier.org now to see the best up-to-date Js Beautifier content for Indonesia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jsbeautifier.org
Visit jsbeautifier.orgWe analyzed Jsbeautifier.org page load time and found that the first response time was 495 ms and then it took 10 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
jsbeautifier.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value4.3 s
43/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value150 ms
94/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.9 s
78/100
10%
495 ms
117 ms
376 ms
724 ms
375 ms
Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Jsbeautifier.org, 6% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Google-analytics.com.
Page size can be reduced by 31.5 kB (53%)
59.7 kB
28.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Jsbeautifier.org main page is 59.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 32.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.8 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 622 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Js Beautifier needs image optimization as it can save up to 622 B or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 34 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jsbeautifier.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (88%)
17
2
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Js Beautifier. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
jsbeautifier.org
495 ms
codemirror.css
117 ms
codemirror.js
376 ms
javascript.js
724 ms
jquery.js
375 ms
jquery.cookie.js
1052 ms
beautify.js
374 ms
beautify-css.js
372 ms
beautify-html.js
373 ms
sanitytest.js
1090 ms
beautify-javascript-tests.js
1089 ms
beautify-css-tests.js
1343 ms
beautify-html-tests.js
1392 ms
javascriptobfuscator_unpacker.js
1342 ms
urlencode_unpacker.js
1342 ms
p_a_c_k_e_r_unpacker.js
1342 ms
myobfuscate_unpacker.js
1342 ms
ga.js
1396 ms
jsbeautifier.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
jsbeautifier.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
jsbeautifier.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jsbeautifier.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jsbeautifier.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jsbeautifier.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Js Beautifier. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: