2.8 sec in total
296 ms
2.4 sec
157 ms
Click here to check amazing Jsmagic content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jsmagic.com
Buy a domain and see how a premium domain can be the best investment. Your business starts here. Buy a domain today.
Visit jsmagic.comWe analyzed Jsmagic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 296 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
jsmagic.com performance score
296 ms
221 ms
57 ms
44 ms
57 ms
Our browser made a total of 123 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Jsmagic.com, 10% (12 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 7% (9 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Staticxx.facebook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 721.8 kB (62%)
1.2 MB
433.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Jsmagic.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 791.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.1 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jsmagic needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 513.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 513.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 169.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jsmagic.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 169.5 kB or 59% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (76%)
101
24
The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jsmagic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jsmagic.com
296 ms
monetate.js
221 ms
application.css
57 ms
ng-modal.css
44 ms
angular.min.js
57 ms
ng-modal.js
44 ms
google_analytics.js
43 ms
google_oauth.js
43 ms
bold_chat.js
46 ms
eloqua.js
44 ms
hotjar.js
52 ms
adroll.js
52 ms
impactRadius.js
50 ms
in.js
55 ms
api.js
69 ms
api:client.js
82 ms
app.js
48 ms
cookies.js
53 ms
socialMedia.js
52 ms
countryDropdown.js
51 ms
monetate.js
53 ms
index.js
52 ms
lander.js
48 ms
seoPages.js
50 ms
sitePages.js
50 ms
search.js
49 ms
modal.js
49 ms
forms.js
49 ms
tldSelector.js
50 ms
setFixedTop.js
53 ms
searchBar.js
50 ms
currency.js
52 ms
trust.js
50 ms
conversion.js
41 ms
tdfs-inner.css
48 ms
tdfs-temp.css
51 ms
thankyou.css
50 ms
entry.js
5 ms
css
24 ms
fontawesome.min.css
15 ms
bd-icons.min.css
16 ms
ga.js
29 ms
foundation-A136666-2811-40ba-bff2-3df3af8bc2ae1.min.js
183 ms
userspace
263 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
175 ms
recaptcha__en.js
282 ms
all.js
171 ms
278 ms
logo-header-2x.png
159 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
189 ms
267 ms
hotjar-10205.js
161 ms
elqCfg.min.js
78 ms
__utm.gif
123 ms
__utm.gif
114 ms
__utm.gif
114 ms
bg-main-hilight-fade.jpg
86 ms
bg-select.png
85 ms
bg-target-bd-icon.png
86 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
104 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
105 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
104 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
105 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
104 ms
postmessageRelay
182 ms
foundation-tags-SD780-3f5b-4f28-957f-6e6dc25a7fc41.min.js
60 ms
svrGP
149 ms
231 ms
framework
79 ms
modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js
151 ms
collect
212 ms
109 ms
xd_arbiter.php
88 ms
xd_arbiter.php
1068 ms
iframe
119 ms
anchor
96 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
58 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
55 ms
styles__ltr.css
34 ms
1233565733-idpiframe.js
57 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
30 ms
-FHGegChvKELgmHNPF97Aj33qC9PBXl7UyexHItfpAU.js
13 ms
webworker.js
21 ms
logo_48.png
21 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
56 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
60 ms
recaptcha__en.js
13 ms
iframerpc
72 ms
vms.js
103 ms
roundtrip.js
8 ms
xd_arbiter.php
19 ms
542IK7HHBBFJJFENPFA7WX.js
35 ms
fbevents.hashing.js
16 ms
out
17 ms
39 ms
14 ms
22 ms
out
21 ms
out
22 ms
out
22 ms
out
20 ms
out
21 ms
out
21 ms
out
24 ms
out
29 ms
bc.pv
107 ms
66 ms
94 ms
adsct
109 ms
u.php
78 ms
sync
22 ms
50 ms
pixel
73 ms
sd
42 ms
377928.gif
40 ms
u.php
74 ms
bounce
32 ms
u.php
89 ms
u.php
116 ms
u.php
81 ms
u.php
84 ms
in
6 ms
tap.php
82 ms
jsmagic.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jsmagic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jsmagic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jsmagic.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jsmagic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: