1 sec in total
77 ms
880 ms
70 ms
Welcome to jt2.com homepage info - get ready to check JT2 best content right away, or after learning these important things about jt2.com
JT2 integrates claims administration with risk control solutions to meet your business needs. Located in Oakland and serving all of California.
Visit jt2.comWe analyzed Jt2.com page load time and found that the first response time was 77 ms and then it took 950 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
jt2.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
76/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value4.3 s
76/100
10%
Value1,320 ms
17/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value13.8 s
10/100
10%
77 ms
48 ms
90 ms
47 ms
70 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jt2.com, 34% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 30% (13 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (407 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 432.4 kB (52%)
832.5 kB
400.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Jt2.com main page is 832.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 531.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 429.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 429.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 527 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JT2 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (36%)
28
18
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JT2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.jt2.com
77 ms
minified.js
48 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
90 ms
polyfill.min.js
47 ms
thunderbolt-commons.24e46262.bundle.min.js
70 ms
main.8752ee81.bundle.min.js
170 ms
lodash.min.js
69 ms
react.production.min.js
167 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
170 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
168 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
169 ms
46ecc3_de1c383289114a499ad95f59ba8830fb~mv2.jpg
90 ms
bundle.min.js
67 ms
5bfb6f_a463284fd84145f292a32dc0f0e0cc31.jpg
39 ms
5bfb6f_bb013bf1966340ceb9a576d68aa42273.jpg
40 ms
46ecc3_f08eafd11236468dacff513da15906e6~mv2_d_1700_2200_s_2.jpg
41 ms
46ecc3_f08eafd11236468dacff513da15906e6~mv2_d_1700_2200_s_2.jpg
43 ms
46ecc3_d5452fdc345a47d0ae897d815604dace~mv2.jpg
274 ms
46ecc3_f66fa3d5dbe34055ae03dd858ccba8e9~mv2_d_2448_2448_s_4_2.jpg
315 ms
46ecc3_66df68152ca5441dad8194c11032845b~mv2.jpg
407 ms
46ecc3_930972dad1064ab8a255303061a3af84~mv2.jpg
365 ms
46ecc3_cf028850cae14b8e9f405983eeb7c09a~mv2.jpg
242 ms
StopFraud.jpg
174 ms
5bfb6f_c9a631e8e43443cb9d7ad97133d9d83d.jpg
173 ms
dbbdc91820535cbbeb0664011cb93255.png
176 ms
112 ms
113 ms
129 ms
119 ms
118 ms
127 ms
144 ms
141 ms
151 ms
149 ms
155 ms
157 ms
4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff
29 ms
b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff
38 ms
6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff
15 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
6 ms
bolt-performance
21 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
6 ms
right-arrow.svg
6 ms
jt2.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
jt2.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
jt2.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jt2.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jt2.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jt2.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of JT2. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: