Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

julesmorgan.com

Portrait Photography

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

537 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

392 ms

julesmorgan.com screenshot

About Website

Visit julesmorgan.com now to see the best up-to-date Julesmorgan content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about julesmorgan.com

How do you want to be photographed? Are you celebrating a milestone, new chapter or transition in your life? Do you need an updated family portrait? Looking to update your headshot or visual image for...

Visit julesmorgan.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Julesmorgan.com page load time and found that the first response time was 537 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

julesmorgan.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,060 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.379

28/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.3 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.julesmorgan.com

537 ms

css

209 ms

semantic.min-72be29f7497da8ca89c89192a4dc80e3.css

614 ms

application-d68677cfc0f865b0b67f36f1fb606a3a.css

495 ms

DU80tcuREl0YbTBxj2SA

184 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Julesmorgan.com, 47% (24 requests) were made to Cdn.filestackcontent.com and 14% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (664 ms) belongs to the original domain Julesmorgan.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 27.6 kB (32%)

Content Size

86.5 kB

After Optimization

58.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Julesmorgan.com main page is 86.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 55.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 27.5 kB

  • Original 31.4 kB
  • After minification 25.6 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.8 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 67 B

  • Original 55.1 kB
  • After minification 55.1 kB
  • After compression 55.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (59%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Julesmorgan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

julesmorgan.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

julesmorgan.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

julesmorgan.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Julesmorgan.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Julesmorgan.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Julesmorgan. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: