21.5 sec in total
6.1 sec
13.7 sec
1.6 sec
Visit junipersjournal.com now to see the best up-to-date Junipersjournal content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about junipersjournal.com
Previews and Reviews
Visit junipersjournal.comWe analyzed Junipersjournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 6.1 sec and then it took 15.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
junipersjournal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value12.8 s
0/100
25%
Value10.9 s
6/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.8 s
28/100
10%
6112 ms
774 ms
56 ms
19 ms
518 ms
Our browser made a total of 129 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Junipersjournal.com, 5% (7 requests) were made to Dsum-sec.casalemedia.com and 5% (6 requests) were made to Px.owneriq.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Junipersjournal.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (49%)
2.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Junipersjournal.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 982.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 253.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 253.8 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Junipersjournal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 708.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 708.9 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 82.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Junipersjournal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 82.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (61%)
118
46
The browser has sent 118 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Junipersjournal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.junipersjournal.com
6112 ms
style.css
774 ms
jquery.min.js
56 ms
shareaholic.js
19 ms
prettify.css
518 ms
styles.css
527 ms
polls-css.css
601 ms
pagenavi-css.css
633 ms
arpw-frontend.css
778 ms
style.css
790 ms
jetpack.css
831 ms
commentluv.css
901 ms
avh-ec.widget.css
947 ms
jquery.js
1794 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1035 ms
prettify_mod.js
1308 ms
commentluv.js
1076 ms
no-right-click.js
1198 ms
jquery.cycle.all.2.72.js
1885 ms
loader.js
124 ms
vertical-m.css
1279 ms
swfobject.js
1089 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1265 ms
scripts.js
1034 ms
polls-js.js
1048 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
6 ms
gprofiles.js
58 ms
wpgroho.js
1098 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1336 ms
e-201611.js
12 ms
css
26 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1331 ms
78ec54b8eb745ce27e736cf249a9d0f5.json
40 ms
bg_repeat.jpg
1072 ms
bg_top.jpg
1515 ms
bg_bottom.jpg
668 ms
bg_center_repeat.jpg
667 ms
bg_header.jpg
2524 ms
ico-contact.png
666 ms
bluefb.png
1018 ms
bluetw.png
1019 ms
cookie-collection.png
1079 ms
signature.png
1290 ms
bg_menu2.png
1077 ms
bg_menu1.png
1291 ms
bg_ring.jpg
1311 ms
bg_date.jpg
1331 ms
renaissance-e1458474533958.jpg
2090 ms
category.jpg
1572 ms
tags.jpg
1572 ms
bubble.jpg
1684 ms
DSCN94041.jpg
2135 ms
DSCN94881.jpg
2369 ms
P13605631.jpg
2334 ms
P13607091.jpg
2362 ms
image002.jpg
2866 ms
fbo1.jpg
2729 ms
DSCN94741.jpg
2846 ms
bbq.jpg
2874 ms
ico-rss-small.jpg
2639 ms
ico-facebook.png
2832 ms
ico-twitter.png
2909 ms
ico-google.png
3027 ms
ico-email.png
3148 ms
ico-bloglovin.png
3104 ms
ico-hellocotton.png
3124 ms
bg_sb1.jpg
3130 ms
P12109491.jpg
3421 ms
~text
209 ms
vepcd74zyZuQXtgnV3VOrg.ttf
27 ms
counter.js
86 ms
shrMain.min.js
17 ms
t.php
347 ms
jquery.min.js
96 ms
akin-50x50.jpg
3099 ms
analytics.js
162 ms
pageview.gif
20 ms
Samsung-Galaxy-Note5-Pink-Gold-1-50x50.jpg
2717 ms
DSCN67961-50x50.jpg
2734 ms
jumbo.jpg
2977 ms
vglnk.js
8 ms
partners.js
3280 ms
g.gif
262 ms
hovercard.css
64 ms
services.css
68 ms
spacer.gif
2452 ms
collect
45 ms
pixel.gif
20 ms
pixel.gif
13 ms
bg_footer.jpg
3175 ms
closeit.png
2569 ms
ping
18 ms
domains
45 ms
sholic.js
55 ms
usermatch
222 ms
beacon.js
4 ms
cms-sh2c.html
59 ms
eexelate.js
32 ms
62 ms
ping_match.gif
17 ms
2964
33 ms
ep
65 ms
pixel
44 ms
59 ms
ep
51 ms
pixel
16 ms
match-result
42 ms
pixel
25 ms
rs
10 ms
net.php
10 ms
generic
9 ms
pixel
22 ms
generic
8 ms
cm
65 ms
xrefid.xgi
7 ms
usermatch
145 ms
pixel.gif
25 ms
xrefid.xgi
6 ms
pixel.gif
3 ms
Vu7NqMAoJYMAAWpZDdgAAAE6%26952
208 ms
i.gif
278 ms
crum
246 ms
pxj
68 ms
crum
235 ms
rum
153 ms
rum
178 ms
rum
180 ms
rum
192 ms
crum
158 ms
junipersjournal.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
junipersjournal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
junipersjournal.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Junipersjournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Junipersjournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
junipersjournal.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Junipersjournal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: