23.9 sec in total
1 sec
21.9 sec
952 ms
Visit prp.jugem.jp now to see the best up-to-date Prp Jugem content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about prp.jugem.jp
Visit prp.jugem.jpWe analyzed Prp.jugem.jp page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 22.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
prp.jugem.jp performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
83/100
10%
Value2.9 s
82/100
25%
Value9.1 s
14/100
10%
Value2,360 ms
5/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value19.0 s
3/100
10%
1037 ms
413 ms
39 ms
322 ms
19656 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Prp.jugem.jp, 23% (22 requests) were made to Imaging.jugem.jp and 12% (11 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.7 sec) relates to the external source Inforkg.jp.
Page size can be reduced by 110.5 kB (65%)
170.4 kB
59.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Prp.jugem.jp main page is 170.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 84.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 64.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Prp Jugem images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 43.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 43.2 kB or 51% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Prp.jugem.jp needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (43%)
74
42
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Prp Jugem. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
prp.jugem.jp
1037 ms
jm_style.css
413 ms
widgets.js
39 ms
share.js
322 ms
ad.php
19656 ms
load.php
322 ms
analytics.js
18 ms
back.gif
239 ms
back_center.gif
239 ms
back_head.gif
403 ms
back_bottom.gif
403 ms
blank.gif
394 ms
date.gif
387 ms
newentries.gif
401 ms
comments.gif
402 ms
archives.gif
546 ms
links.gif
548 ms
profile.gif
571 ms
cover_bottom.gif
573 ms
top.gif
572 ms
jg_ads_init_inactive.js
17 ms
collect
34 ms
jg_ads_inactive.js
6 ms
show_ads.js
8 ms
show_ads_impl.js
101 ms
jg_ads_init_display2.js
6 ms
collect
193 ms
jg_ads_display2.js
46 ms
ads
207 ms
jg_ads_init_bottom_entry.js
25 ms
jg_ads_bottom_entry2.js
26 ms
osd.js
59 ms
back.gif
459 ms
back_center.gif
148 ms
ads
196 ms
ads
203 ms
share_button.html
338 ms
share_button.html
336 ms
share_button.html
337 ms
share_button.html
333 ms
share_button.html
339 ms
share_button.html
337 ms
share_button.html
609 ms
share_button.html
606 ms
share_button.html
641 ms
share_button.html
639 ms
sdk.js
72 ms
cover_top.gif
286 ms
cover.gif
402 ms
cell.gif
426 ms
date.gif
7 ms
91 ms
blank.gif
256 ms
xd_arbiter.php
75 ms
xd_arbiter.php
149 ms
back_head.gif
483 ms
back_bottom.gif
571 ms
newentries.gif
452 ms
comments.gif
300 ms
css
55 ms
m_js_controller.js
36 ms
abg.js
40 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
29 ms
s
20 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
25 ms
x_button_blue2.png
10 ms
archives.gif
402 ms
links.gif
465 ms
Rf2QnA3orEL6Eez56HJgxRuQ77qJyxbefnbSCBE0iUQ.js
6 ms
PuwvqkdbcqU-fCZ9Ed-b7b3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff
55 ms
profile.gif
442 ms
top.gif
556 ms
cover_bottom.gif
592 ms
cover_top.gif
644 ms
bt_check_6_r001.png
13 ms
cover.gif
569 ms
cell.gif
304 ms
button.71000885400e222c3c0eec823f8f93f0.js
101 ms
disp.php
715 ms
tweet_button.fd774b599f565016d763dd860cb31c79.ja.html
107 ms
share_button.php
118 ms
share_button.php
132 ms
share_button.php
142 ms
share_button.php
151 ms
share_button.php
168 ms
share_button.php
140 ms
share_button.php
208 ms
share_button.php
181 ms
share_button.php
188 ms
share_button.php
185 ms
3XaI8mzWBSs.js
541 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
640 ms
jot.html
3 ms
play_icon.gif
356 ms
prp.jugem.jp accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
prp.jugem.jp best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
prp.jugem.jp SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
JA
JA
EUC-JP
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Prp.jugem.jp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Prp.jugem.jp main page’s claimed encoding is euc-jp. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
prp.jugem.jp
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Prp Jugem. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: