4.7 sec in total
9 ms
2.5 sec
2.1 sec
Welcome to kidlingville.com homepage info - get ready to check Kidlingville best content right away, or after learning these important things about kidlingville.com
the holy land...or something
Visit kidlingville.comWe analyzed Kidlingville.com page load time and found that the first response time was 9 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Kidlingville.com rating and web reputation
kidlingville.com performance score
9 ms
259 ms
200 ms
222 ms
233 ms
Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Kidlingville.com, 14% (15 requests) were made to S2.wp.com and 8% (9 requests) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 736.0 kB (52%)
1.4 MB
681.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Kidlingville.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 834.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 117.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 117.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Kidlingville images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 605.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 605.6 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kidlingville.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.6 kB or 62% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 74 (76%)
97
23
The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kidlingville. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thebookofalice.wordpress.com
9 ms
thebookofalice.wordpress.com
259 ms
200 ms
css
222 ms
css
233 ms
188 ms
166 ms
204 ms
style.css
188 ms
gprofiles.js
481 ms
wpgroho.js
161 ms
200 ms
192 ms
tiled-gallery.css
179 ms
206 ms
widgets.js
211 ms
167 ms
725X1342.skimlinks.js
366 ms
w.js
197 ms
global-print.css
164 ms
merriweather.css
20 ms
webfont.js
974 ms
white-texture.png
157 ms
header-2x.png
219 ms
slide12.jpg
896 ms
follow
894 ms
slide11-e1409682079289.jpg
965 ms
title-texture.png
114 ms
sprite.png
115 ms
loading.gif
113 ms
sdk.js
879 ms
NotJyGZTK7GLAkNHL8QcIA.woff
864 ms
NBeaBKmA1yw4KFklLc4VJBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
1003 ms
QE9s8g-qEzb0Jh-PosZOeQ.woff
1128 ms
XqqLK6UXkPPoniwD9d7dlz8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
1130 ms
Genericons.svg
157 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
5 ms
master.html
932 ms
Noticons.svg
619 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
30 ms
merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf
615 ms
merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf
783 ms
merriweather-light-webfont.ttf
834 ms
850 ms
hovercard.css
533 ms
services.css
651 ms
share
725 ms
g.gif
726 ms
count.json
725 ms
graph.facebook.com
832 ms
share
804 ms
count.json
804 ms
graph.facebook.com
896 ms
share
837 ms
count.json
801 ms
graph.facebook.com
961 ms
share
843 ms
count.json
797 ms
graph.facebook.com
951 ms
share
864 ms
count.json
791 ms
graph.facebook.com
979 ms
share
832 ms
count.json
790 ms
graph.facebook.com
951 ms
share
828 ms
count.json
787 ms
graph.facebook.com
937 ms
share
822 ms
count.json
819 ms
graph.facebook.com
943 ms
g.gif
543 ms
g.gif
540 ms
g.gif
523 ms
g.gif
521 ms
g.gif
538 ms
g.gif
579 ms
g.gif
578 ms
g.gif
621 ms
g.gif
620 ms
g.gif
620 ms
g.gif
619 ms
g.gif
645 ms
g.gif
645 ms
g.gif
651 ms
g.gif
651 ms
g.gif
651 ms
g.gif
650 ms
g.gif
655 ms
g.gif
654 ms
g.gif
656 ms
g.gif
656 ms
g.gif
655 ms
g.gif
655 ms
g.gif
653 ms
g.gif
652 ms
g.gif
650 ms
ikb0lgh.js
571 ms
317 ms
xd_arbiter.php
276 ms
jquery.js
107 ms
postmessage.js
46 ms
jed.js
46 ms
underscore.min.js
51 ms
jquery.wpcom-proxy-request.js
5 ms
33 ms
9 ms
likes-rest.js
35 ms
p.gif
131 ms
kidlingville.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kidlingville.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Kidlingville.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
kidlingville.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Kidlingville. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: