2.8 sec in total
383 ms
1.9 sec
507 ms
Click here to check amazing Happy Life content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about happy.life.edu
Visit happy.life.eduWe analyzed Happy.life.edu page load time and found that the first response time was 383 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
happy.life.edu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.8 s
0/100
10%
Value15.1 s
0/100
25%
Value14.8 s
1/100
10%
Value250 ms
84/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value15.5 s
7/100
10%
383 ms
77 ms
152 ms
161 ms
169 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Happy.life.edu, 15% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 11% (7 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (562 ms) belongs to the original domain Happy.life.edu.
Page size can be reduced by 445.6 kB (26%)
1.7 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Happy.life.edu main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 186.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Happy Life needs image optimization as it can save up to 186.8 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 168.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 168.9 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Happy.life.edu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 60.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (58%)
64
27
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Happy Life. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
happy.life.edu
383 ms
style.css
77 ms
style.css
152 ms
styles.css
161 ms
meteor-slides.css
169 ms
responsive-videos.css
156 ms
widgets.css
167 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
184 ms
default.css
224 ms
jquery.js
384 ms
modernizr.custom.97935.js
230 ms
pc_modernizr_custom.js
231 ms
superfish.js
231 ms
pc_superfish_init.js
249 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
289 ms
custom-fancybox.js
300 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js
298 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js
296 ms
jquery.flexslider2.1beta.js
315 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
424 ms
jquery.metadata.v2.js
370 ms
jquery.touchwipe.1.1.1.js
365 ms
slideshow.js
376 ms
jquery.form.min.js
406 ms
scripts.js
458 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
60 ms
gprofiles.js
68 ms
wpgroho.js
458 ms
e-201540.js
4 ms
e-201540.js
33 ms
ga.js
34 ms
header.png
140 ms
SLIDE-JOURNAL-COVER-1280x598.jpg
510 ms
BIRD-1280x598.jpg
296 ms
flower-1280x598.jpg
336 ms
GIVING-1280x598.jpg
406 ms
SEEDS-1280x598.jpg
333 ms
SLIDE-COMPLIMENT-1280x598.jpg
448 ms
SLIDE-FUN-SKATEBOARD-1280x598.jpg
562 ms
bullet.png
400 ms
search.png
404 ms
wp-logo-16px.png
467 ms
g.gif
40 ms
hovercard.css
29 ms
services.css
56 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
arrows-white.png
417 ms
buttons.png
414 ms
likebox.php
214 ms
jTuqQ-OPDr6.css
182 ms
n370yiaI2G6.css
223 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
303 ms
x5F9OMjKyLw.js
363 ms
ICDbTSzjQEg.js
290 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
297 ms
12670555_10153878357507243_4077388829292287439_n.jpg
220 ms
12647066_10153846710332243_84295477700922156_n.jpg
259 ms
12196059_10207302335664127_8838537436055400104_n.jpg
358 ms
12662640_10205622652662175_2300251378472886234_n.jpg
329 ms
12360087_10153622468094713_7055888207241764521_n.jpg
331 ms
12507480_1051330211556898_3887548240066075917_n.jpg
337 ms
12359833_556990564459956_3915468860309245033_n.jpg
338 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
56 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
56 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
43 ms
vlXaquuXMrr.js
81 ms
happy.life.edu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
happy.life.edu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
happy.life.edu SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Happy.life.edu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Happy.life.edu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
happy.life.edu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Happy Life. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: