3.7 sec in total
446 ms
2.8 sec
369 ms
Click here to check amazing Labcompare content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about labcompare.com
Labcompare is designed for scientists and researchers working in Research and Development | labcompare.com
Visit labcompare.comWe analyzed Labcompare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 446 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
labcompare.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value5.6 s
18/100
25%
Value8.8 s
15/100
10%
Value710 ms
42/100
30%
Value0.8
5/100
15%
Value13.3 s
12/100
10%
446 ms
465 ms
623 ms
229 ms
7 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Labcompare.com, 41% (25 requests) were made to Media.labcompare.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.oas-c17.adnxs.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (651 ms) relates to the external source Media.labcompare.com.
Page size can be reduced by 104.1 kB (22%)
476.3 kB
372.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Labcompare.com main page is 476.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 342.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Labcompare images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 25.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 25.6 kB or 38% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (28%)
60
43
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Labcompare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.labcompare.com
446 ms
CommonStyleSheet.ashx
465 ms
CommonJavaScript.ashx
623 ms
ControlJavaScript.ashx
229 ms
BrightcoveExperiences.js
7 ms
widgets.js
83 ms
HeaderBackground.gif
203 ms
1.png
401 ms
CNFooterLogo.png
78 ms
us.gif
298 ms
183204-52x39.jpg
302 ms
182734-52x39.jpg
301 ms
181862-52x39.jpg
299 ms
182864-187x140.jpg
493 ms
182866-187x140.jpg
492 ms
181572-187x140.jpg
447 ms
183240-187x140.jpg
414 ms
183196-187x140.jpg
349 ms
182961-187x140.jpg
426 ms
182902-187x140.jpg
492 ms
182905-187x140.jpg
495 ms
182909-187x140.jpg
508 ms
182911-187x140.jpg
523 ms
182912-187x140.jpg
556 ms
172008-187x140.jpg
558 ms
182099-187x140.jpg
558 ms
183236-52x39.jpg
574 ms
182845-52x39.jpg
581 ms
182213-52x39.jpg
597 ms
182046-52x39.jpg
639 ms
182041-52x39.jpg
643 ms
182212-52x39.jpg
640 ms
182211-52x39.jpg
651 ms
1783210023@Right,Right1,Top
13 ms
standard
20 ms
ga.js
28 ms
HeaderBackground.jpg
92 ms
__utm.gif
19 ms
SearchButtonBackground.png
89 ms
0
22 ms
upgrade_flash_player2.gif
5 ms
1447970422
29 ms
spriteMedium.png
230 ms
1445526828
62 ms
s57640399334486
107 ms
all.js
366 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
134 ms
BreadcrumbIcons.png
81 ms
FeaturedNavigation-large.gif
82 ms
FeaturedNavigation.png
82 ms
follow_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
49 ms
info.json
87 ms
151 ms
xd_arbiter.php
217 ms
xd_arbiter.php
446 ms
jot
96 ms
chartbeat.js
66 ms
ping
5 ms
like.php
120 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
478 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
540 ms
labcompare.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
labcompare.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
labcompare.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Labcompare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Labcompare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
labcompare.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Labcompare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: