5.3 sec in total
96 ms
2.3 sec
2.9 sec
Welcome to laidout.org homepage info - get ready to check Laidout best content right away, or after learning these important things about laidout.org
Laidout, desktop publishing software.
Visit laidout.orgWe analyzed Laidout.org page load time and found that the first response time was 96 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
laidout.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value2.8 s
83/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value2,090 ms
7/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value15.4 s
7/100
10%
96 ms
125 ms
83 ms
95 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Laidout.org, 27% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (287 ms) relates to the external source Youtube.com.
Page size can be reduced by 403.1 kB (77%)
524.5 kB
121.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Laidout.org main page is 524.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 331.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.8 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Laidout images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 99.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 99.8 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 282.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Laidout.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 282.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (25%)
20
15
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Laidout. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
laidout.org
96 ms
laidout.org
125 ms
style.css
83 ms
jquery-3.0.0.min.js
95 ms
scrim.css
25 ms
scrim.js
27 ms
parallax.js
25 ms
PAerFTFBbVo
252 ms
GPz3BniLSFw
287 ms
LaidoutBanner.png
244 ms
someicons.png
210 ms
Find-0.97.1.png
168 ms
Hare.png
200 ms
Start.png
159 ms
Tortoise.png
170 ms
dot.png
161 ms
laidout-logo-s.jpg
176 ms
loading.gif
140 ms
www-player.css
62 ms
www-embed-player.js
138 ms
base.js
247 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
241 ms
laidout.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
laidout.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
laidout.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Laidout.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Laidout.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
laidout.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Laidout. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: