5.3 sec in total
284 ms
4.6 sec
351 ms
Click here to check amazing Laserscript content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about laserscript.co.uk
The Laserscipt range of machinery includes CO2 and fibre laser engraving and cutting machines, CNC routers, waterjet and pipe cutting machines
Visit laserscript.co.ukWe analyzed Laserscript.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 284 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
laserscript.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value13.5 s
0/100
25%
Value20.3 s
0/100
10%
Value11,910 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value18.3 s
3/100
10%
284 ms
1566 ms
72 ms
297 ms
397 ms
Our browser made a total of 114 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Laserscript.co.uk, 82% (94 requests) were made to Laserscript.net and 13% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Laserscript.net.
Page size can be reduced by 160.0 kB (27%)
592.2 kB
432.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Laserscript.co.uk main page is 592.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 274.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 27.2 kB or 12% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 66.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Laserscript.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 66.6 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 92 (96%)
96
4
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Laserscript. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 73 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
laserscript.co.uk
284 ms
www.laserscript.net
1566 ms
css
72 ms
style.min.css
297 ms
styles.min.css
397 ms
style.css
386 ms
font-awesome.min.css
392 ms
style.min.css
386 ms
style.css
397 ms
dripicons.css
402 ms
stylesheet.min.css
776 ms
print.css
469 ms
style_dynamic.css
470 ms
responsive.min.css
481 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
490 ms
js_composer.min.css
668 ms
custom_css.css
549 ms
style.css
534 ms
formreset.min.css
552 ms
formsmain.min.css
556 ms
readyclass.min.css
615 ms
browsers.min.css
622 ms
frontend.min.js
755 ms
jquery.min.js
750 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
869 ms
jquery.json.min.js
870 ms
gravityforms.min.js
871 ms
qode-like.min.js
871 ms
core.min.js
873 ms
accordion.min.js
874 ms
menu.min.js
876 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
877 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
879 ms
dom-ready.min.js
880 ms
hooks.min.js
881 ms
i18n.min.js
879 ms
a11y.min.js
892 ms
autocomplete.min.js
893 ms
controlgroup.min.js
895 ms
analytics.js
59 ms
collect
19 ms
collect
49 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
624 ms
button.min.js
554 ms
datepicker.min.js
556 ms
mouse.min.js
550 ms
resizable.min.js
545 ms
draggable.min.js
602 ms
dialog.min.js
618 ms
droppable.min.js
562 ms
progressbar.min.js
546 ms
selectable.min.js
545 ms
sortable.min.js
530 ms
style.css
525 ms
slider.min.js
761 ms
spinner.min.js
758 ms
tooltip.min.js
734 ms
tabs.min.js
690 ms
effect.min.js
692 ms
effect-blind.min.js
576 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
578 ms
effect-clip.min.js
468 ms
effect-drop.min.js
468 ms
effect-explode.min.js
471 ms
effect-fade.min.js
469 ms
effect-fold.min.js
469 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
467 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
466 ms
effect-size.min.js
466 ms
effect-scale.min.js
465 ms
effect-shake.min.js
464 ms
effect-slide.min.js
513 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
512 ms
plugins.js
1018 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
502 ms
lemmon-slider.min.js
508 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
508 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
503 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
564 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
895 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
894 ms
jquery.stretch.js
891 ms
imagesloaded.js
892 ms
rangeslider.min.js
835 ms
jquery.event.move.js
918 ms
jquery.twentytwenty.js
902 ms
TweenLite.min.js
915 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
888 ms
smoothPageScroll.min.js
900 ms
default_dynamic.js
679 ms
default.min.js
675 ms
custom_js.js
663 ms
comment-reply.min.js
661 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
659 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
649 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
678 ms
wp-embed.min.js
673 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
673 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
115 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
446 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
456 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
453 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
452 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
476 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
878 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf
176 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf
219 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf
219 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf
218 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf
218 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf
217 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf
219 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf
231 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf
230 ms
laserscript.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
laserscript.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
laserscript.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Laserscript.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Laserscript.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
laserscript.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Laserscript. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: