1.9 sec in total
104 ms
1.4 sec
371 ms
Visit layerbit.com now to see the best up-to-date Layerbit content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about layerbit.com
Houston Marketing Firm, Marketing Houston, CRM, SEO Social Media, web design.
Visit layerbit.comWe analyzed Layerbit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 104 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
layerbit.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.3 s
98/100
10%
Value1.3 s
100/100
25%
Value1.3 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.3 s
100/100
10%
104 ms
698 ms
102 ms
179 ms
222 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Layerbit.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to W3.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (698 ms) belongs to the original domain Layerbit.com.
Page size can be reduced by 109.7 kB (30%)
369.4 kB
259.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Layerbit.com main page is 369.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 207.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Layerbit images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 76.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 76.9 kB or 62% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (49%)
45
23
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Layerbit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
layerbit.com
104 ms
www.layerbit.com
698 ms
mootools.js
102 ms
yoo_effects.js.php
179 ms
js.php
222 ms
css.php
178 ms
valid-xhtml10
34 ms
vcss-blue
44 ms
page_bg_t.jpg
42 ms
page_bg_img.jpg
208 ms
topmenu_item_bg.png
48 ms
toolbar_twitter.png
49 ms
toolbar_feed.png
50 ms
logo.png
100 ms
menu_level1_item.png
101 ms
menu_dropdown_corners.png
102 ms
menu_dropdown_edges.png
103 ms
icon_warp7.png
104 ms
menu_level2_line_h.png
108 ms
icon_warp6.png
116 ms
icon_Diseno.png
142 ms
icon_warp8.png
139 ms
wrapper_corners.png
144 ms
wrapper_edges.png
147 ms
wrapper_line.png
154 ms
module_rounded_grey_corners.png
185 ms
marketing.jpg
186 ms
portfolio.jpg
226 ms
delicious.png
188 ms
digg.png
192 ms
facebook.png
230 ms
tumblr.png
246 ms
twitter.png
224 ms
reader.png
242 ms
competidor.jpg
248 ms
content_wrapper_corners.png
250 ms
content_wrapper_edges_with.png
275 ms
content_wrapper_edges_without.png
265 ms
module_rounded_lightgrey_corners.png
271 ms
module_badges.png
278 ms
module_rounded_lightgrey_edges.png
281 ms
module_sidebar_grey_lines.png
292 ms
module_sidebar_grey_shadow.png
321 ms
module_rounded_grey_edges.png
300 ms
ga.js
30 ms
footer_anchor.png
303 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
layerbit.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
layerbit.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
layerbit.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Layerbit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Layerbit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
layerbit.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Layerbit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: