7 sec in total
277 ms
5.9 sec
833 ms
Visit ledgemedia.net now to see the best up-to-date Ledge Media content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ledgemedia.net
Visit ledgemedia.netWe analyzed Ledgemedia.net page load time and found that the first response time was 277 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
ledgemedia.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value930 ms
30/100
30%
Value0.123
83/100
15%
Value12.6 s
14/100
10%
277 ms
772 ms
416 ms
405 ms
407 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Ledgemedia.net, 24% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Ledgemedia.net.
Page size can be reduced by 238.7 kB (22%)
1.1 MB
840.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Ledgemedia.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 448.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 52.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ledge Media images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 100.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 100.3 kB or 31% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 78.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ledgemedia.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 78.3 kB or 32% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (67%)
54
18
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ledge Media. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ledgemedia.net
277 ms
www.ledgemedia.net
772 ms
style.min.css
416 ms
nectar-slider.css
405 ms
font-awesome.min.css
407 ms
grid-system.css
411 ms
style.css
1086 ms
magnific.css
539 ms
css
29 ms
responsive.css
675 ms
style.css
683 ms
ascend.css
547 ms
js_composer.min.css
807 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
822 ms
jquery.min.js
945 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
818 ms
js
68 ms
player.js
33 ms
anime.js
706 ms
nectar-slider.js
1101 ms
jquery.easing.js
825 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
831 ms
priority.js
843 ms
transit.js
949 ms
waypoints.js
1043 ms
modernizr.js
1043 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
1043 ms
hoverintent.js
1101 ms
magnific.js
1101 ms
touchswipe.min.js
1102 ms
caroufredsel.min.js
1123 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1352 ms
superfish.js
1355 ms
init.js
1831 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1351 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1354 ms
css
16 ms
Logo-01.png
354 ms
icon1-1.png
448 ms
icon2.png
448 ms
analytics.png
442 ms
icon3.png
447 ms
logo.png
447 ms
332600113
316 ms
02-1.jpg
1455 ms
grid.png
540 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
673 ms
Untitled-12.gif
2422 ms
sec-4-before.jpg
539 ms
js
266 ms
analytics.js
192 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
247 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
249 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
319 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf
337 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf
338 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
337 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
339 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
339 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf
338 ms
sec-last.jpg
882 ms
footer-banner.jpg
604 ms
collect
108 ms
778349486-903d66fd233b99c21d2915c117b4082703325374c2c6f98156c0d4d59beaacb7-d
672 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
1312 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
132 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
133 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
132 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
132 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
115 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
132 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
132 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
133 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
133 ms
icomoon.woff
617 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
683 ms
ledgemedia.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ledgemedia.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ledgemedia.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ledgemedia.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ledgemedia.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ledgemedia.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ledge Media. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: