3.8 sec in total
169 ms
3.4 sec
216 ms
Click here to check amazing LetterHUB content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about letterhub.com
LetterHUB is a printing, processing, and mailing company that helps businesses of all sizes across the country.
Visit letterhub.comWe analyzed Letterhub.com page load time and found that the first response time was 169 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
letterhub.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value10.5 s
0/100
25%
Value9.7 s
10/100
10%
Value1,250 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value13.9 s
10/100
10%
169 ms
1189 ms
328 ms
245 ms
452 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Letterhub.com, 20% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Js.hs-scripts.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Letterhub.com.
Page size can be reduced by 153.9 kB (18%)
846.6 kB
692.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Letterhub.com main page is 846.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 309.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 67.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, LetterHUB needs image optimization as it can save up to 67.9 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 7.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 61 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Letterhub.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (71%)
45
13
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LetterHUB. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
letterhub.com
169 ms
letterhub.com
1189 ms
layerslider.css
328 ms
style.min.css
245 ms
full-styles.6.10.2.css
452 ms
mkhb-render.css
243 ms
mkhb-row.css
302 ms
mkhb-column.css
354 ms
js_composer.min.css
487 ms
theme-options-production-1705931520.css
484 ms
masterslider.main.css
541 ms
shortcodes-styles.min.css
877 ms
letterhub.com
1316 ms
webfontloader.js
723 ms
jquery.min.js
724 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
782 ms
layerslider.utils.js
1001 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
984 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
961 ms
lar-public.js
1035 ms
4073052.js
44 ms
page-preloader.js
1153 ms
smoothscroll.js
1160 ms
core-scripts.6.10.2.js
1589 ms
components-full.6.10.2.js
1229 ms
mkhb-render.js
1300 ms
mkhb-column.js
1425 ms
shortcodes-scripts.min.js
1424 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1521 ms
css
55 ms
KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf
78 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf
101 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf
112 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf
133 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf
133 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf
133 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
133 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
133 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
133 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
155 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
154 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
154 ms
letterhub-logo-black-small-1.png
376 ms
letterhub-logo-white-small-1.png
375 ms
banknote-1.png
376 ms
print.png
376 ms
message1.png
377 ms
index.png
458 ms
rsz_541618-freshbooks.jpg
472 ms
new-gmail-logo.png
490 ms
zoho-download.png
480 ms
freshdesk-logo.png
631 ms
icloud_logo.png
603 ms
leadflows.js
105 ms
banner.js
319 ms
4073052.js
136 ms
fb.js
95 ms
collectedforms.js
104 ms
conversations-embed.js
94 ms
letterhub.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
letterhub.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
letterhub.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Letterhub.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Letterhub.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
letterhub.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of LetterHUB. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: