3.4 sec in total
373 ms
2.9 sec
147 ms
Welcome to lgce.net homepage info - get ready to check LGCE best content right away, or after learning these important things about lgce.net
LGCE has extensive experience as a supplier of passive FttX systems, structured cabling and power cable solutions.
Visit lgce.netWe analyzed Lgce.net page load time and found that the first response time was 373 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
lgce.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value11.1 s
6/100
10%
Value3,690 ms
1/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.4 s
24/100
10%
373 ms
534 ms
987 ms
801 ms
716 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Lgce.net, 8% (6 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Lgce.net.
Page size can be reduced by 659.0 kB (59%)
1.1 MB
458.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Lgce.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 541.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.1 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LGCE images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 398.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 398.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 210.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lgce.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 210.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (63%)
70
26
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LGCE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lgce.net
373 ms
lgce.net
534 ms
bootstrap.min.css
987 ms
font-awesome.css
801 ms
flexslider.css
716 ms
fancybox.css
717 ms
owl.carousel.css
715 ms
vm-validation.css
717 ms
vm-global.css
1013 ms
vm-menus.css
816 ms
vm-mobile.css
814 ms
clp.white.css
817 ms
ekko-lightbox.css
899 ms
map.css
916 ms
mapplic.css
914 ms
i-map.css
928 ms
sjm5mzo.js
62 ms
js
62 ms
home.css
996 ms
jquery-3.4.1.min.js
1125 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1116 ms
velocity.js
1157 ms
jquery.validate.js
1098 ms
jquery.easing.js
1099 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
1115 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
1196 ms
owl.carousel.js
1291 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
1220 ms
jquery.marquee.min.js
1221 ms
vm-utils.js
1220 ms
vm-form-manager.js
1227 ms
vm-form-ajax.js
1285 ms
vm-form-validation.js
1317 ms
slick.min.js
1318 ms
vm-global.js
1319 ms
clp.js
1333 ms
ekko-lightbox.js
1388 ms
hammer.min.js
1392 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
1415 ms
smoothscroll.js
1414 ms
mapplic.js
712 ms
logo.png
465 ms
linkedin.png
466 ms
facebook.png
563 ms
twitter.png
561 ms
uk.png
562 ms
nl.png
562 ms
d.png
561 ms
slide-1.jpg
562 ms
slide-2.jpg
764 ms
slide-3.jpg
674 ms
icon-f-1.png
669 ms
icon-f-2.png
671 ms
icon-f-3.png
672 ms
project.jpg
609 ms
icon-f-4.png
694 ms
analytics.js
62 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
679 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
691 ms
icon-f-5.png
654 ms
logo-20.png
652 ms
logo-21.png
740 ms
collect
25 ms
logo-22.png
707 ms
logo-23.png
684 ms
logo-1.png
685 ms
logo-2.png
684 ms
logo-3.png
678 ms
logo-4.png
714 ms
logo-5.png
704 ms
logo-6.png
679 ms
logo-7.png
680 ms
logo-8.png
679 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
237 ms
d
102 ms
d
121 ms
d
139 ms
d
167 ms
d
140 ms
p.gif
29 ms
lgce.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
lgce.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
lgce.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lgce.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lgce.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lgce.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of LGCE. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: