3 sec in total
355 ms
2.4 sec
222 ms
Visit liesing.at now to see the best up-to-date Liesing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about liesing.at
Visit liesing.atWe analyzed Liesing.at page load time and found that the first response time was 355 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
liesing.at performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
12/100
10%
Value21.0 s
0/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value150 ms
94/100
30%
Value0.24
52/100
15%
Value9.6 s
29/100
10%
355 ms
645 ms
638 ms
547 ms
227 ms
Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Liesing.at, 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (730 ms) belongs to the original domain Liesing.at.
Page size can be reduced by 320.6 kB (53%)
610.3 kB
289.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Liesing.at main page is 610.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 296.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 10.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.5 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 81.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Liesing needs image optimization as it can save up to 81.2 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 93.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 93.4 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 136.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Liesing.at needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 136.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (35%)
17
11
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Liesing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
liesing.at
355 ms
www.liesing.at
645 ms
template.css
638 ms
jquery.min.js
547 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
227 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
232 ms
caption.js
220 ms
bootstrap.min.js
327 ms
template.js
435 ms
html5fallback.js
440 ms
css
24 ms
blue-flower.jpg
433 ms
Einzug_der_Familien_0da7aa8ec8.jpg
336 ms
bchereiliesing_klein.jpg
321 ms
Logo_Grafik.jpg
322 ms
f_zied.jpg
427 ms
Steuerberater_Zankena.jpg
306 ms
Friseur_David_Horvat.jpg
730 ms
IcoMoon.woff
638 ms
liesing.at accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
liesing.at best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
liesing.at SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Liesing.at can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Liesing.at main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
liesing.at
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Liesing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: