3.9 sec in total
293 ms
3.4 sec
216 ms
Click here to check amazing LIFA content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lifa.dk
I LIFA løser vi alle former for opgaver indenfor landinspektørfaget, data og analyse. Vi udvikler IT-løsninger baseret på kort- & ejendomsdata
Visit lifa.dkWe analyzed Lifa.dk page load time and found that the first response time was 293 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
lifa.dk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
4/100
10%
Value16.3 s
0/100
25%
Value12.0 s
4/100
10%
Value1,360 ms
17/100
30%
Value0.29
41/100
15%
Value17.2 s
4/100
10%
293 ms
1748 ms
132 ms
248 ms
427 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Lifa.dk, 7% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifa.dk.
Page size can be reduced by 563.5 kB (63%)
900.8 kB
337.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifa.dk main page is 900.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 380.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.4 kB, which is 49% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LIFA images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 271.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 271.9 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 240.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifa.dk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 240.1 kB or 91% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (72%)
36
10
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LIFA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lifa.dk
293 ms
www.lifa.dk
1748 ms
hLib.css
132 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.24.custom.css
248 ms
grid.css
427 ms
base.css
406 ms
view_shared.css
422 ms
view_article.css
431 ms
view_home.css
338 ms
view_search.css
348 ms
modernizr.min.js
585 ms
css
66 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
627 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.24.custom.min.js
653 ms
jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.js
561 ms
jquery.validate.js
666 ms
jquery.validate.unobtrusive.js
610 ms
hLib.base.js
675 ms
hLib.easing.js
695 ms
hLib.mobilemenu.js
708 ms
hLib.hPush.js
748 ms
lifa.js
766 ms
header.js
773 ms
mainmenu.js
776 ms
lifa.responsiveArticle.js
802 ms
polyfiller.js
818 ms
errormessages-da.js
836 ms
logo.png
277 ms
Landm%C3%A5ling%20med%20prisme.jpg
286 ms
gtm.js
95 ms
header-lines.png
272 ms
icons-s96f82ce22d.png
404 ms
front-bg.jpg
640 ms
FUDHvzEKSJww3kCxuiAo2A.ttf
49 ms
0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
56 ms
analytics.js
25 ms
collect
3 ms
collect
56 ms
ga-audiences
64 ms
collect
24 ms
print.css
117 ms
lifa.dk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lifa.dk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lifa.dk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DA
DA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifa.dk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Danish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifa.dk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifa.dk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LIFA. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: