Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 43

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

lifeedited.com

- LifeEdited

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

66 ms

Resources Loaded

920 ms

Page Rendered

197 ms

lifeedited.com screenshot

About Website

Visit lifeedited.com now to see the best up-to-date Life Edited content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifeedited.com

Design your life to include more money, health and happiness with less stuff, space and energy.

Visit lifeedited.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifeedited.com page load time and found that the first response time was 66 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Lifeedited.com rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

lifeedited.com performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

70/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.525

14/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.7 s

90/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifeedited.com

66 ms

www.lifeedited.com

123 ms

style.css

59 ms

admin-bar.min.css

57 ms

style.css

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Lifeedited.com, 40% (29 requests) were made to Lifeedited.zippykid.netdna-cdn.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (228 ms) relates to the external source S.ytimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 533.5 kB (53%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

481.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Lifeedited.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 349.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 39.3 kB

  • Original 48.1 kB
  • After minification 41.0 kB
  • After compression 8.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.1 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 19.9 kB

  • Original 315.8 kB
  • After minification 295.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Life Edited images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 185.4 kB

  • Original 302.1 kB
  • After minification 300.7 kB
  • After compression 116.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 185.4 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 288.9 kB

  • Original 349.4 kB
  • After minification 331.3 kB
  • After compression 60.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifeedited.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 288.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (71%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Life Edited. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lifeedited.com accessibility score

43

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role] values are not valid

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lifeedited.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

lifeedited.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifeedited.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifeedited.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Life Edited. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: