1.2 sec in total
66 ms
920 ms
197 ms
Visit lifeedited.com now to see the best up-to-date Life Edited content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifeedited.com
Design your life to include more money, health and happiness with less stuff, space and energy.
Visit lifeedited.comWe analyzed Lifeedited.com page load time and found that the first response time was 66 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Lifeedited.com rating and web reputation
lifeedited.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value5.4 s
21/100
25%
Value4.7 s
70/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.525
14/100
15%
Value3.7 s
90/100
10%
66 ms
123 ms
59 ms
57 ms
58 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Lifeedited.com, 40% (29 requests) were made to Lifeedited.zippykid.netdna-cdn.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (228 ms) relates to the external source S.ytimg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 533.5 kB (53%)
1.0 MB
481.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifeedited.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 349.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.1 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Life Edited images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 185.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 185.4 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 288.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifeedited.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 288.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (71%)
48
14
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Life Edited. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lifeedited.com
66 ms
www.lifeedited.com
123 ms
style.css
59 ms
admin-bar.min.css
57 ms
style.css
58 ms
adapt.css
58 ms
ct-dropdowns.css
55 ms
prettyPhoto.css
53 ms
comments.css
103 ms
flexslider.css
104 ms
style_2.1.1.css
106 ms
jquery.min.js
55 ms
jquery.nailthumb.1.0.min.js
111 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
106 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
109 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
151 ms
core.js
147 ms
comment-reply.min.js
155 ms
external-tracking.min.js
154 ms
css
25 ms
prettyPhoto.css
33 ms
ct-dropdowns.css
63 ms
admin-bar.min.css
69 ms
style.css
65 ms
adapt.css
67 ms
style.css
70 ms
comments.css
32 ms
flexslider.css
28 ms
style_2.1.1.css
27 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
53 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
103 ms
jquery.nailthumb.1.0.min.js
100 ms
css
15 ms
style.css
63 ms
core.js
31 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
28 ms
comment-reply.min.js
56 ms
external-tracking.min.js
57 ms
post-print.css
125 ms
ga.js
73 ms
lifeedited2.jpg
94 ms
4NrHT2MgCGU
123 ms
count.js
110 ms
jquery.form-n-validate.js
60 ms
track.js
57 ms
search_16.png
28 ms
twitter_16x16.png
28 ms
facebook_16x16.png
29 ms
youtube_16x16.png
29 ms
rss_16x16.png
29 ms
WIND_WB_yoko-300x200.jpg
29 ms
nick-martin-300x200.jpg
30 ms
acre-300x200.jpg
31 ms
about-video.jpg
33 ms
casa-KingLoftBed-020416A-300x200.jpg
30 ms
peerspace-300x200.jpg
32 ms
walden-300x200.jpg
31 ms
shadow.png
37 ms
email.png
34 ms
resize_me.png
35 ms
post-print.css
35 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
34 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
39 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
54 ms
track.gif
24 ms
__utm.gif
18 ms
www-embed-player-vflZsBgOl.css
99 ms
www-embed-player.js
123 ms
base.js
228 ms
6BOEML_YqI6cKINK5dmh8ZufcXg7sBa4jeB-I9gQ0xI.js
34 ms
ad_status.js
34 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
76 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
84 ms
lifeedited.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role] values are not valid
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lifeedited.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
lifeedited.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifeedited.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifeedited.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifeedited.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Life Edited. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: