3.6 sec in total
400 ms
2.4 sec
751 ms
Welcome to lifego.de homepage info - get ready to check Lifego best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about lifego.de
Das lifego.de Magazin ist seit dem Jahr 2001 online und hat mehrere tausend redaktionelle Artikel veröffentlicht. Unsere Leser vertrauen auf unsere gute Unterhaltung seit mehr als 15 Jahren.
Visit lifego.deWe analyzed Lifego.de page load time and found that the first response time was 400 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
lifego.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value5.2 s
23/100
25%
Value5.4 s
56/100
10%
Value620 ms
48/100
30%
Value0.131
81/100
15%
Value5.1 s
75/100
10%
400 ms
146 ms
179 ms
180 ms
180 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Lifego.de, 21% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (489 ms) belongs to the original domain Lifego.de.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (77%)
1.6 MB
368.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifego.de main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 775.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 72.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.8 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifego images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 491.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 491.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 692.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifego.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 692.0 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (60%)
48
19
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifego. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.lifego.de
400 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
146 ms
frontend.css
179 ms
style.css
180 ms
style.css
180 ms
css
26 ms
css
39 ms
css
45 ms
css
45 ms
css
46 ms
css
47 ms
td-bootstrap.css
178 ms
style.css
364 ms
js_composer.css
325 ms
jquery.js
361 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
267 ms
immer_oben.js
470 ms
ivw.js
356 ms
supb.js
353 ms
mediumrect.js
350 ms
sky.js
354 ms
form.js
221 ms
yuzo-postviews-cache.js
222 ms
jquery.equalizer.js
314 ms
td_external.js
489 ms
site.js
436 ms
wp-embed.min.js
422 ms
comment-reply.min.js
422 ms
gta.js
475 ms
lfg-logo1-300x100.gif
100 ms
fabalista_logo.jpg
102 ms
Clipboard02-5-326x159.jpg
192 ms
Clipboard02-4-326x159.jpg
102 ms
Clipboard02-3-100x65.jpg
102 ms
Clipboard02-2-100x65.jpg
186 ms
aktuell-1.jpg
189 ms
people-2.jpg
186 ms
lifestyle-3.jpg
277 ms
music-2.jpg
191 ms
tv-3.jpg
274 ms
technik-3.jpg
277 ms
iam.js
443 ms
fpc.pl
86 ms
UFoEz2uiuMypUGZL1NKoeg.ttf
75 ms
F51BEgHuR0tYHxF0bD4vwvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
126 ms
lhhB5ZCwEkBRbHMSnYuKyA.ttf
161 ms
bMbHEMwSUmkzcK2x_74QbA.ttf
172 ms
7-wH0j2QCTHKgp7vLh9-sQ.ttf
179 ms
B7BtHjNYwAp3HgLNagENOQ.ttf
178 ms
347 ms
qs.ioam.de
192 ms
tx.io
193 ms
elements.png
134 ms
335 ms
Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsKDbm6fPDOZJsR8PmdG62gY.ttf
25 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nJRhFVcex_hajThhFkHyhYk.ttf
27 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nPOYkGiSOYDq_T7HbIOV1hA.ttf
32 ms
b9hP8wd30SygxZjGGk4DCQ.ttf
93 ms
NWdMogIO7U6AtEM4dDdf_aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
93 ms
j-TYDdXcC_eQzhhp386SjaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
93 ms
pqisLQoeO9YTDCNnlQ9bf6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
94 ms
tx.io
148 ms
top-shadow.png
136 ms
lifego.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
lifego.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
lifego.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifego.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Lifego.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifego.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifego. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: