30.3 sec in total
12.9 sec
17.1 sec
311 ms
Click here to check amazing LIFEWALK content for Nigeria. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lifewalk.com.ng
Visit lifewalk.com.ngWe analyzed Lifewalk.com.ng page load time and found that the first response time was 12.9 sec and then it took 17.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
lifewalk.com.ng performance score
12889 ms
270 ms
203 ms
201 ms
284 ms
Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (101 requests) were addressed to the original Lifewalk.com.ng, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (12.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifewalk.com.ng.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (23%)
4.9 MB
3.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Lifewalk.com.ng main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LIFEWALK images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 749.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 749.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 253.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifewalk.com.ng needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 253.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (54%)
102
47
The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LIFEWALK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lifewalk.com.ng
12889 ms
k2.css
270 ms
normalize.css
203 ms
layout.css
201 ms
joomla.css
284 ms
system.css
200 ms
template.css
234 ms
menu.css
332 ms
gk.stuff.css
300 ms
style1.css
302 ms
ot_lightbox_login.css
610 ms
sc_bootstrap.css
889 ms
default.css
587 ms
modal.css
561 ms
carouselck.css
622 ms
mootools-core.js
804 ms
core.js
681 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
1079 ms
k2.js
756 ms
caption.js
730 ms
mootools-more.js
1271 ms
gk.scripts.js
875 ms
gk.menu.js
873 ms
validate.js
915 ms
otscript.js
1004 ms
engine.js
1006 ms
modal.js
968 ms
jquery.min.js
1101 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
1047 ms
jquery.mobile.customized.min.js
1167 ms
carouselck.js
1098 ms
ajax_1.5.pack.js
1174 ms
widget-init.js
1449 ms
bg1.png
2659 ms
LifeWalk-logo3.png
126 ms
images.jpg
127 ms
selfnsp_522.jpg
125 ms
lifensp_522.jpg
119 ms
barrier2nsp_522.jpg
162 ms
k2.items.cache.52ec984cc72302fd412e2aa145a6526c_Lnsp_522.jpg
162 ms
blank.gif
158 ms
ot-lightbox-button.png
222 ms
glyphicons-halflings.png
169 ms
header_bg.png
241 ms
social_icons.png
241 ms
widget-iframe-content-min
189 ms
1e.jpg
429 ms
2e.jpg
394 ms
3e.jpg
486 ms
4e.jpg
648 ms
5e.jpg
521 ms
6.jpg
554 ms
7.jpg
688 ms
8.jpg
649 ms
9.jpg
689 ms
10.jpg
735 ms
11.jpg
826 ms
1e_th.jpg
734 ms
2e_th.jpg
767 ms
3e_th.jpg
769 ms
4e_th.jpg
813 ms
5e_th.jpg
815 ms
6_th.jpg
847 ms
7_th.jpg
851 ms
8_th.jpg
892 ms
9_th.jpg
895 ms
10_th.jpg
906 ms
11_th.jpg
926 ms
carouselck_skins.png
931 ms
css
25 ms
main.css
802 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
804 ms
bootstrap.css
810 ms
widget-custom-style.css
872 ms
customer-chat-widget-libs.min.js
1340 ms
customer-chat-widget.min.js
888 ms
emot-1.png
901 ms
emot-2.png
907 ms
emot-3.png
953 ms
emot-4.png
977 ms
emot-5.png
992 ms
emot-6.png
993 ms
emot-7.png
844 ms
emot-8.png
814 ms
emot-9.png
802 ms
emot-10.png
758 ms
emot-11.png
774 ms
emot-12.png
698 ms
emot-13.png
711 ms
emot-14.png
700 ms
emot-15.png
740 ms
emot-16.png
697 ms
emot-17.png
714 ms
emot-18.png
706 ms
emot-19.png
741 ms
emot-20.png
697 ms
loading.gif
758 ms
glyphicons-halflings-white.png
519 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
5 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
8 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
9 ms
widget-templates.html
91 ms
operator-is-online
118 ms
tablet.css
82 ms
mobile.css
86 ms
all.js
6 ms
lifewalk.com.ng SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifewalk.com.ng can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifewalk.com.ng main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifewalk.com.ng
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LIFEWALK. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: