3.3 sec in total
383 ms
2.7 sec
182 ms
Click here to check amazing Lighting 1 content for Turkey. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lighting1.com
Lighting Companies, Suppliers, Manufacturers, Importers, Exporters and Distributors
Visit lighting1.comWe analyzed Lighting1.com page load time and found that the first response time was 383 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
lighting1.com performance score
383 ms
424 ms
138 ms
254 ms
385 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Lighting1.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Foodproducts1.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Lighting1.com.
Page size can be reduced by 151.0 kB (53%)
284.1 kB
133.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Lighting1.com main page is 284.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 111.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.5 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lighting 1 needs image optimization as it can save up to 21.2 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 34 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 68.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lighting1.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 68.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (56%)
50
22
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lighting 1. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
lighting1.com
383 ms
www.lighting1.com
424 ms
min-styles.css
138 ms
new2.css
254 ms
jquery-1.11.2.min.js
385 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
322 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
568 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
276 ms
10_jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.js
513 ms
20_jquery.maskedinput.js
378 ms
20_utils.js
405 ms
ajaxUploads.js
448 ms
javascript-min2.js
892 ms
captcha.js
526 ms
fileuploader.js
623 ms
formGenerator.js
623 ms
grid.js
632 ms
javascript-min.js
937 ms
javascript-min1.js
981 ms
jquery.cookie.js
715 ms
jquery.dd.js
733 ms
jquery.fcbkcomplete.js
756 ms
jquery.knob.js
845 ms
jquery.tagsinput.js
864 ms
jquery-te-1.4.0.min.js
876 ms
keyPress.js
992 ms
lightbox-2.6.min.js
1004 ms
menu.js
1004 ms
modernizr.custom.js
1019 ms
window.js
1040 ms
jquery.dcjqaccordion.2.9.js
1091 ms
b-p.js
1100 ms
dejavusans-webfont.woff
662 ms
ga.js
20 ms
loading.gif
255 ms
en-ico.png
123 ms
de-ico.png
127 ms
fr-ico.png
129 ms
lighting.png
130 ms
h1.jpg
131 ms
ok1.jpg
245 ms
h2.jpg
255 ms
join.png
254 ms
bannerslide.jpg
380 ms
bgbanner.jpg
258 ms
logo-footer.jpg
277 ms
Banner-kafuexpo-2015-1344a3156923aad025c100d7f845865e.jpg
365 ms
banner-partner-banner-ffc8b614d688665892a7071a2a3dc5f2.jpg
395 ms
Banner-algeria-kitchen-bath-and-lighting-expo-2016-e2299ee16dcb4ea787ba9f9e8396a26e.jpg
396 ms
Banner-the-14th-china-guangdonginternational-hospitality-supplies-fair-c4652623a9eccfedca508f44489d7c34.jpg
396 ms
Banner-outdoor-design-build-show-2016-dd91e83514dd3ffa2fb0740b7e0d4c5e.jpg
405 ms
Banner-led-china-2015-1390551068afe780fdad451028a366f3.jpg
485 ms
Banner-the-big-5-construct-india-2016-10181139efb3351f1eff8251990ff12a.jpg
504 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
ui-bg_highlight-hard_100_f9f9f9_1x100.png
447 ms
arrow.png
123 ms
lighting.jpg
127 ms
search-selected.jpg
128 ms
search-btn.png
132 ms
arrow-green-btn.png
129 ms
arrowdown.png
129 ms
arrow-footer.png
244 ms
bx_loader.gif
252 ms
dinregular-webfont.woff
252 ms
lighting1.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lighting1.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lighting1.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lighting1.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lighting 1. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: