2.5 sec in total
238 ms
1.5 sec
769 ms
Click here to check amazing Lightpack content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lightpack.tv
Lightpack is an ambient display lighting system that syncs with on-screen content to dynamically backlight your TV monitor and computer with LED lights.
Visit lightpack.tvWe analyzed Lightpack.tv page load time and found that the first response time was 238 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
lightpack.tv performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
68/100
10%
Value5.1 s
24/100
25%
Value6.8 s
35/100
10%
Value4,800 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value18.9 s
3/100
10%
238 ms
144 ms
150 ms
149 ms
147 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Lightpack.tv, 7% (5 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (763 ms) belongs to the original domain Lightpack.tv.
Page size can be reduced by 972.0 kB (35%)
2.8 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Lightpack.tv main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.1 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 359.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lightpack needs image optimization as it can save up to 359.5 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 332.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 332.1 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 260.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lightpack.tv needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 260.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (41%)
61
36
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lightpack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lightpack.tv
238 ms
reset.css
144 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
150 ms
slick.css
149 ms
jquery-ui.css
147 ms
KitAnimate.css
150 ms
layout.css
295 ms
jquery-2.1.1.min.js
359 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
300 ms
css3-mediaqueries.js
221 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
218 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
225 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
293 ms
slick.min.js
437 ms
device.js
299 ms
KitSend.js
385 ms
main.js
386 ms
widgets.js
85 ms
logo.png
82 ms
feature-1.jpg
222 ms
feature-2.jpg
218 ms
feature-3.jpg
158 ms
feature-4.jpg
82 ms
feature-5.jpg
81 ms
feature-6.jpg
158 ms
prismatik-l.png
184 ms
prismatik-c.png
185 ms
prismatik-r.png
305 ms
player_api
46 ms
more-arrow.png
189 ms
difference-back.jpg
197 ms
eye-1.png
195 ms
eye-2.png
264 ms
light1.png
469 ms
disp-left.png
338 ms
light2.png
482 ms
disp-right.png
337 ms
light3.png
763 ms
disp-bg.png
702 ms
fact-1.jpg
599 ms
fact-2.jpg
519 ms
quote-back.jpg
697 ms
proxima_nova_semibold.woff
616 ms
proxima_nova_light.woff
567 ms
proxima_nova_regular.woff
635 ms
proxima_nova_regular_italic.woff
639 ms
www-widgetapi.js
66 ms
soc2.png
751 ms
tweet.04d20138f67ab41d6b4af6cc583926d9.js
140 ms
left-arrow.png
634 ms
right-arrow.png
636 ms
8ttCmII50nM
114 ms
syndication
111 ms
tweets.json
136 ms
www-embed-player-vflQrT_sR.css
79 ms
www-embed-player.js
102 ms
yrK4EqpSRdoujKQmsJoZ5WaLgeULvcWnibQMQSxOOnM.js
47 ms
ad_status.js
50 ms
tweet.7edb5b7c103e282bacfdf7055ee51cce.light.ltr.css
51 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
125 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
150 ms
tweet.7edb5b7c103e282bacfdf7055ee51cce.light.ltr.css
97 ms
kfYwGbg7_normal.png
76 ms
Y8KgScSr_normal.jpg
86 ms
26744_normal.jpg
88 ms
e-tSlE7L_normal.jpg
88 ms
CCLYotMWMAEQBwi.jpg:small
89 ms
jot.html
29 ms
lightpack.tv accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lightpack.tv best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
lightpack.tv SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lightpack.tv can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lightpack.tv main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lightpack.tv
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lightpack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: