3.1 sec in total
967 ms
1.9 sec
183 ms
Welcome to limefile.com homepage info - get ready to check Limefile best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about limefile.com
See related links to what you are looking for.
Visit limefile.comWe analyzed Limefile.com page load time and found that the first response time was 967 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
limefile.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value6.0 s
46/100
10%
Value210 ms
88/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value5.3 s
73/100
10%
967 ms
366 ms
501 ms
375 ms
290 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Limefile.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (967 ms) belongs to the original domain Limefile.com.
Page size can be reduced by 131.4 kB (29%)
449.6 kB
318.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Limefile.com main page is 449.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 305.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Limefile images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 71.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 71.3 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Limefile.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (44%)
32
18
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Limefile. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
limefile.com
967 ms
cloud.css
366 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
501 ms
xupload.js
375 ms
swfobject.js
290 ms
jquery.uploadify.v2.1.4.min.js
294 ms
form_bg.png
188 ms
back.png
172 ms
social_bk.png
101 ms
ico_fb.png
94 ms
ico_tr.png
101 ms
ico_in.png
103 ms
ico_bl.png
186 ms
logo.png
187 ms
login_back.png
193 ms
password_back.png
192 ms
button_submit.png
195 ms
btn_reg.png
255 ms
lang_bg.png
275 ms
flags.png
276 ms
nav_back.png
285 ms
content_tp.png
285 ms
content_bk.png
286 ms
tag.png
501 ms
social_bk.png
169 ms
form_cont.png
452 ms
tab_active.png
353 ms
tab.png
354 ms
browse_bkinner.png
361 ms
file_browse.png
364 ms
btn_upload.png
365 ms
blank.html
166 ms
footer_home.png
166 ms
limefile.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
limefile.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
limefile.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Limefile.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Limefile.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
limefile.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Limefile. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: